Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 26;110(5):1067–1078. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz178

TABLE 1.

Study characteristics of included cohorts1

Authors Country Cohort name Follow-up years n enrolled (n analyzed) Male, % Mean age,2 y BMI,3kg/m2 Funding source Comorbidities
Adriouch et al. (41) France NutriNet-Santé 18 84,158 (84,158) 21.3 44.1 ± 14.5 NR Government, academia Diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
Arts et al. (25) Netherlands The Zutphen Elderly Study 10 939 (806) 100 71 (65–84) 25.5 (NR) Government Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
Arts et al. (26) United States Iowa Women's Health Study 12 34,492 (32,857) 0 61.5 (55–69) 26.9 (NR) Government Diabetes, hypertension, CVD
Cassidy et al. (27) United States NHS, NHS II, HPFS 14 156,957 (156,957) 14.7 44.6 (25–75) 24.6 (NR) Government Hypertension
Cassidy et al. (28) United States NHS 18 93,600 (93,600) 0 36.6 (25–42) 24.6 (NR) Government Diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
Dower et al. (29) Netherlands The Zutphen Elderly Study 25 774 (774) 100 71.9 (65–84) 25.6 (NR) Government, industry Diabetes, CVD, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
Goetz et al. (30) United States REGARDS 6.5 30,239 (20,024) 44 64.6 (NR) 29.1 (NR) Government Diabetes, hypertension
Goetz et al. (31) United States REGARDS 6 16,678 (16,678) 41.2 64.3 (NR) 29 (NR) Government NR
Grosso et al. (42) Poland HAPIEE subcohort 4 10,728 (5806) 47 57.4 (45–69) 27.7 (NR) Government, foundation NR
Grosso et al. (43) Poland HAPIEE subcohort 4 2725 (2725) 42.2 55.6 (45–69) 26.4 (NR) Government, foundation Hypertension
Ivey et al. (32) Australia Calcium Intake Fracture Outcome Study 5 1063 (1063) 0 80.1 (NR) 27.1 (NR) Government, foundation, hospital Diabetes, hypertension
Jacques et al. (33) United States Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort 11.9 2915 (2915) 45.5 54.2 (28–62) 26.7 (NR) Government, foundation Diabetes, CVD
Lajous et al. (34) France EPIC 13.8 40,574 (40,574) 0 51.6 (NR) 22.2 (NR) Government, foundation Diabetes, CVD, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
McCullough et al. (35) United States American Cancer Society's CPS-II Nutrition Cohort 7 98,469 (98,469) 38.77 69.1 (NR) NR Government Diabetes, CVD, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
Mink et al. (36) United States Iowa Women's Health Study 12 34,492 (34,492) 0 61 (55–69) 26.9 (NR) Foundation Diabetes, CVD, hypertension
Mursu et al. (37) Finland The Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study 15.2 2682 (1950) 100 52.4 (42–60) 26.7 (NR) Foundation Diabetes, CVD
Ponzo et al. (47) Italy NR 12 1658 (1658) 47 54.6 (45–64) 26.6 (NR) Government CVD, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension
Tresserra-Rimbau et al. (38) Spain PREDIMED 4.3 7447 (7172) 42.65 67 (NR) 30 (NR) Government Diabetes, CVD, hypertension
Tresserra-Rimbau et al. (44) Spain PREDIMED 5.51 3430 (3430) 38.3 66.6 (NR) 29.9 (NR) Government, industry Hypercholesterolemia, hypertension
Vogiatzoglou et al. (39) United Kingdom EPIC-Norfolk 11.1 25,639 (24,885) 34 60 (40–75) 27 (NR) Government, industry Diabetes, CVD, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia
Wedick et al. (40) United States NHS, NHS II, HPFS 12–18 289,900 (199,980) 20.6 (0, 0, 100) 44.3 (25–75) 24.9 (NR) Government Diabetes, CVD, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension
Zamora-Ros et al. (45, 46) Eight European countries EPIC-Interact subcohort NR 16,154 (15,268) 37.8 52.4 (NR) 26.0 (NR) Government CVD, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension

1CPS, Cancer Prevention Study; CVD, cardiovascular disease; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; HAPIEE, Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial factors in Eastern Europe; HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study; NR, not reported; PREDIMED, Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea study; REGARDS, REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke.

2

Mean ± SD or mean (range).

3

Mean ± SD.