Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 24;10:2395. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02395

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the distribution of proteins assigned at phylum and class levels for each methodology.

Gel-based
Gel-free
TAX-DB NAM-DB AM-DB Comb-DB TAX-DB NAM-DB AM-DB Comb-DB
Phylum
Proteobacteria 87.2 92.7 95.2 89.8 87.6 92.9 91.5 90.0
Cyanobacteria 6.3 2.9 2.0 4.0 2.6 4.8 1.6 2.0
Bacteroidetes 4.9 4.2 2.4 5.0 7.6 1.4 6.1 5.8
Other (<1%) 1.6 0.2 0.4 1.2 2.2 0.9 0.8 2.2
Class
Alphaproteobacteria 73.7 81.6 79.9 74.3 69.7 68.4 68.4 67.5
Gammaproteobacteria 12.9 11.5 14.8 14.4 18.0 25.7 24.4 23.5
Flavobacteriia 6.5 3.7 2.2 3.9 6.3 3.5 4.9 4.8
Unclassified Cyanobacteria 3.9 2.7 1.8 5.3 2.5 1.4 1.2 2.1
Other (<1%) 3.0 0.5 1.2 2.1 3.6 1.0 1.0 2.2

Values represent the proportion of proteins with identical taxonomy on total identified protein using TAX-DB, NAM-DB, AM-DB, or Comb-DB in both gel-free and gel-based approaches. The number of peptides detected for each protein was used as quantitative value. Taxa displaying a proportion <1% were gathered into “Other” category.