Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;124(4):731–748. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy161

Table 2.

Genetic diversity within Miscanthus sacchariflorus and M. × giganteus collected in eastern Asia

DAPC group No. of individuals SNP diversity (D) Mean extrapolated allelic richness* Number of SNPs with minor allele frequency >0.05 N P N P unique Plastid Gini–Simpson index Plastid Gini–Simpson index excluding Msi haplotypes
Yangtze diploids (ssp. lutarioriparius) 67 0.115 1.71 11 377 17 5 0.69 ± 0.06 0.69 ± 0.06
N China diploids 64 0.139 1.82 15 087 18 3 0.85 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.03
Korea/NE China/Russia diploids 256 0.141 1.89 14 778 20 9 0.85 ± 0.01 0.85 ± 0.01
N China/Korea/Russia tetraploids 139 0.133 1.94 14 648 19 7 0.79 ± 0.03 0.79 ± 0.03
S Japan tetraploids 120 0.139 1.89 15 509 20 6 0.75 ± 0.04 0.74 ± 0.04
N Japan tetraploids 76 0.134 1.80 14 249 9 2 0.46 ± 0.07 0.45 ± 0.07
Mxg (2x × 2x) 7 0.123 1.82 12 616 5 0 0.86 ± 0.10 0.86 ± 0.10
Mxg (4x × 2x) 30 0.187 1.86 18 897 9 0 0.77 ± 0.06 0.53 ± 0.13

Groupings are based on discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) for 34 605 RAD-seq SNPs (Fig. 2).

Msi, M. sinensis; Mxg, M. × giganteus; D, diversity, as calculated from expected heterozygosity of RAD-seq SNPs (allele frequencies were estimated from read count data using the R package polyfreqs for tetraploid and triploid groups, and directly from genotypes called with UNEAK for diploid groups; standard error of D = 0.001 for each group); NP, number of plastid haplotypes; NP unique, number of plastid haplotypes unique to each group.

*Standard error of 0.001 or 0.002 for each group for allelic richness.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure