Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 19;27(10):1796–1809. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.07.006

Table 1.

Correlation between miR-602 Expression and Clinicopathological Parameters of ESCC Patients

Characteristic Discovery Group (n = 93)
Validation Group (n = 108)
Low (n = 19) High (n = 74) p Value Low (n = 31) High (n = 77) p Value
Gender

Male 15 (19.5%) 62 (80.5%) 0.618
24 (26.7%) 66 (73.3%) 0.295
Female 4 (25.0%) 12 (75.0%) 7 (38.9%) 11 (61.1%)

Age (Years)

≤60 6 (22.2%) 21 (77.8%) 0.784
8 (21.1%) 30 (78.9%) 0.195
>60 13 (19.7%) 53 (80.3%) 23 (32.9%) 47 (67.1%)

Tumor Size (cm)

<5 10 (19.6%) 41 (80.4%) 0.828
18 (25.7%) 52 (74.3%) 0.351
≥5 9 (21.4%) 33 (78.6%) 13 (34.2%) 25 (65.8%)

Tumor Stagea

T1 + T2 7 (31.8%) 15 (68.2%) 0.146
8 (30.8%) 18 (69.2%) 0.789
T3 + T4 11 (17.2%) 53 (82.8%) 23 (28.0%) 59 (72.0%)

Histological Grade

Well and moderate 16 (21.6%) 58 (78.4%) 0.574
24 (27.3%) 64 (72.7%) 0.490
Poor and NS 3 (15.8%) 16 (84.2%) 7 (35.0%) 13 (65.0%)

Lymph Node Metastasis

Negative 15 (33.3%) 30 (66.7%) 0.003
26 (43.3%) 34 (56.7%) 0.000
Positive 4 (8.3%) 44 (91.7%) 5 (10.4%) 43 (89.6%)

Clinical Stagea

I + II 15 (31.2%) 33 (68.8%) 0.006 25 (41.7%) 35 (58.3%) 0.001
III + IV 3 (7.5%) 37 (92.5%) 6 (12.5%) 43 (87.5%)
a

Numbers do not equal to the total number due to missing data.