Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 18;13(11):2305–2328. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12570

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of FF and FFPE tissues in a patient cohort. (A) Benign and tumorous samples were punched from prostate tissue stored since resection as FF and FFPE. The hematoxylin and eosin staining of FF and FFPE tissue from Patient No. 2 in the ProCOC cohort is shown here. AL, anterior left; AR, anterior right; PL, posterior left; PR, posterior right. (B) Overall technical CV of FFPE and FF samples at peptide level. (C) Comparison of median protein abundance in FF (x‐axis) versus FFPE (y‐axis) samples. Each dot denotes one protein identified in this sample cohort.