Table 2.
Bi-variable and multivariable analyses result of antenatal depression among pregnant women in Aneded woreda, 2019
| Variables | Antenatal depression | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depressed | Normal | ||||
| Age in year | |||||
| 15–19 | 25 | 83 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 |
| 20–29 | 24 | 160 | 0.5 (0.25, 0.93) | 0.6 (0.21, 1.44) | 0.22 |
| ≥ 30 | 3 | 47 | 0.2 (0.06, 0.74) | 0.2 (0.02, 1.25) | 0.08 |
| Occupation status | |||||
| House wife | 28 | 220 | 1 | ||
| Government employee | 11 | 17 | 5.1 (2.2, 11.9) | 8.8 (2.06, 34.40)* | 0.001 |
| Merchant | 13 | 53 | 1.9 (0.94, 3.97) | 3.7 (1.27, 10.91)* | 0.01 |
| Residence | |||||
| Urban | 12 | 15 | 5.5 (2.4, 12.6) | 6.8 (1.97, 23.32)* | 0.001 |
| Rural | 40 | 275 | 1 | ||
| Marital status | |||||
| Unmarried** | 14 | 17 | 5.9 (2.7, 12.97) | 5.1 (1.79, 14.63)* | 0.001 |
| Married | 38 | 273 | 1 | ||
| Wealth index | |||||
| Poorest | 5 | 71 | 0.2 (0.10, 0.62) | 0.1 (0.07, 1.23) | 0.12 |
| Poor | 9 | 88 | 0.3 (0.13, 0.52) | 0.2 (0.14, 1.57) | 0.09 |
| Middle | 3 | 54 | 0.1 (0.04, 0.63) | 0.09 (0.05, 1.08) | 0.07 |
| Rich | 35 | 77 | 1 | 1 | 0.15 |
| Gravidity | |||||
| Yes | 20 | 239 | 1 | ||
| No | 32 | 51 | 7.5 (3.97, 14.2) | 5.3 (2.03, 13.82)* | 0.001 |
| Pregnancy planning | |||||
| Yes | 28 | 236 | 1 | ||
| No | 24 | 54 | 3.75 (2.02, 6.97) | 6.2 (2.37, 16.06)* | 0.001 |
| ANC follow up | |||||
| Yes | 21 | 238 | 1 | ||
| No | 31 | 52 | 6.76 (3.6, 12.7) | 8.7 (3.46, 21.79)* | 0.001 |
| IPV | |||||
| Yes | 13 | 11 | 8.46 (3.54, 20.2) | 4.5 (1.28, 15.52)* | 0.01 |
| No | 39 | 279 | 1 | ||
| Substance use | |||||
| Yes | 25 | 28 | 8.7 (4.44, 16.92) | 5.6 (2.12, 14.92)* | 0.001 |
| No | 27 | 262 | 1 | ||
*Statisically significance (P < 0.05)
**Single, divorced and widowed