Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 30;19:330. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2321-2

Table 3.

Sensitivity analyses of methodological characteristics

Antenatal depression Postnatal depression
Number of studies Total number of subjects (HIV+/controls) OR (95% CI) I2 (%) P Number of studies Total number of subjects (HIV+/controls) OR (95% CI) I2 (%) P
Meta-analysis
 Random-effects model 13 1520/4383 1.42 (1.12, 1.80) 55 10 1645/2135 1.58 (1.08, 2.32) 65
 Fixed-effects model 13 1520/4383 1.32 (1.15, 1.52) 55 10 1645/2135 1.39 (1.13, 1.71) 65
Sub group analysis
 Methodological quality 0.31 0.04
  Low 0 0
  Medium 6 343/1732 1.88 (0.93, 3.79) 76 2 477/259 0.97 (0.64, 1.46) 0
  High 7 1177/2651 1.29 (1.11, 1.51) 0 8 1168/1876 1.86 (1.16, 2.98) 67
Study design 0.11 0.13
 Cross-sectional 8 808/2428 1.74 (1.19, 2.54) 58 7 1119/1763 1.92 (1.11, 3.34) 72
 Case-control 2 86/200 1.62 (0.59, 4.45) 73 1 49/113 1.55 (0.73, 3.30)
 Other 3 626/1755 1.11 (0.91, 1.36) 0 2 477/259 0.97 (0.64, 1.46) 0
Depression screening tool 0.71 0.04
 EPDS 7 1095/3714 1.58 (1.13, 2.21) 67 4 567/661 2.31 (1.17, 4.56) 69
 CES-D 3 225/305 1.25 (0.63, 2.47) 68 3 878/679 0.97 (0.72, 1.29) 0
 Other 3 200/364 1.30 (0.86, 1.99) 0 3 200/795 1.73 (0.82, 3.65) 32
Geographical locations 0.03 0.19
 Africa 11 1331/4165 1.55 (1.20, 2.01) 56 8 1457/1917 1.78 (1.12, 2.84) 68
 North America 2 189/218 0.88 (0.58, 1.35) 0 2 188/218 1.07 (0.58, 1.97)

Abbreviations: CES-D Centre for Epidemiologic Surveys for Depression, EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale