Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 25;36(9):2493–2505. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01016-2

Table 1.

MfERG data at baseline and during follow-up

Baseline ANOVA vs AMD-P 6 months ANOVA vs baseline
Mean SD f (1,27) p Mean SD f (1,27) p
R1 RAD (nV/degree2)
 AMD-P (n = 14) 65.24 14.06 65.12 20.19 0.001 0.991
 AMD-M (n = 14) 61.52 15.22 0.43 0.516 85.02 27.91 7.64 0.010
R2 RAD (nV/degree2)
 AMD-P (n = 14) 26.93 5.43 28.08 8.21 0.17 0.685
 AMD-M (n = 14) 26.65 7.47 0.02 0.886 34.78 12.46 4.48 0.044
R3 RAD (nV/degree2)
 AMD-P (n = 14) 16.07 3.94 18.58 4.25 2.91 0.099
 AMD-M (n = 14) 15.24 4.55 0.21 0.651 18.39 4.98 3.07 0.092
R4 RAD (nV/degree2)
 AMD-P (n = 14) 11.42 3.61 12.98 3.61 1.34 0.258
 AMD-M (n = 14) 11.91 2.73 0.17 0.691 12.81 3.24 0.63 0.434
R5 RAD (nV/degree2)
 AMD-P (n = 14) 8.24 3.06 8.42 2.37 0.03 0.864
 AMD-M (n = 14) 7.91 3.21 0.42 0.524 8.81 2.10 0.77 0.388

Mean ± standard deviation (SD) of multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) R1–R5 N1–P1 response amplitude density (RAD) values detected at baseline and after 6 months of follow-up in AMD eyes treated with placebo (AMD-P eyes) or with Macuprev® (AMD-M eyes). R1–R5 refers to localized mfERG responses averaged in five eccentricity areas between the fovea and mid-periphery: 0–2.5° (R1), 2.5–5° (R2), 5–10° (R3), 10–15° (R4), and 15–20° (R5). Statistics: analysis of variance (ANOVA) between AMD-P and AMD-M groups at baseline and between AMD-P and AMD-M groups at 6 months vs baseline; n number of eyes