Table II.
FACTS | |
---|---|
Prevalence of infertility: similar to Western countries | |
Negative consequences of childlessness are much stronger | |
Prevention and alternative methods are not always successful | |
↑ secondary infertility due to STDs and unsafe abortions / deliveries | |
HIV and infertility: ↑ prevalence of HIV in infertile couples | |
HIV and infertility: very different in how the issue has been treated by the international community | |
Access to IVF in Africa: less than 1.5 % | |
Arguments contra global access to infertility care | |
Overpopulation | |
Limited resources | |
Problem of funding: “the battle for money’ between initiatives on reproductive health care | |
Arguments pro global access to infertility care | |
↑ Demand from developing countries | |
ART techniques can be simplified | |
Social justice and equity | |
VIEWS | |
A need for ↑ reproductive health care education | |
A need for ↑ prevention programmes | |
Raising awareness: support of media and patients networks needed | |
Implementation of more and accessible infertility centres → Urgent need for simplified, safe and effective methods (diagnostic procedures and ART) | |
Prevention of complications is crucial: OHSS, multiple pregnancies | |
Facilities to handle complications have to be available, including facilities for surgery | |
VISION | |
Simplified methods of infertility care will be available in the near future | |
The demand from Africa to introduce ART will increase | |
The implementation of accessible infertility centres should be part of an integrated reproductive care programme including family planning and contraception, mother care and reproductive health. | |
Foundations, NGOs and international societies have to be convinced about the value of this project |