Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Sep 14;45(12):3128–3136. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.08.009

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of vessel detection sensitivity between conventional Doppler and ultrasensitive ultrasound microvessel imaging (UMI). (a) Conventional Doppler and (b) UMI images of a 43-y-old woman with a fibroadenoma mass. Maximum mass diameter: 2.0 cm. (c) Conventional Doppler and (d) UMI images of a 40-y-old woman. Nottingham grade I (of III) invasive ductal. Maximum mass diameter: 1.9 cm.