Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Aug 8;72(11):1741–1751. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.07.021

Table 4.

Scar Cosmesis (Scar Scales) (n=9)

Article Acute vs. Reconstruction Outcome
(n=number of patients)
Anderson et al., 2011 Acute (n=5 (DRM); n=8 (control)) Median VSS DRM: 6
Median VSS control (CEA +STSG): 4
*Not a significant difference
Branski et al., 2007 Acute (n= 10) Mean Hamilton-burn scar score:
DRM: 4.2
Autograft-allograft (control): 6.6
Danin et al., 2012 Acute (n=22) Mean VSS: 2.08
Lagus et al., 2013 Acute (n= 10) Mean ΔVSS:
DRM: 2.5 → 1.3
STSG: 2.5 → 0.8
Cellonex: 2.9 → 0.8
Zajicek et al., 2017 Acute (n=11) Mean VSS score:
DRM: 1.4
DE graft (control): 4
Chou et al., 2001 Reconstruction (n=13) Mean ΔVSS: 8.7 → 2.5
Moiemen et al., 2001 Reconstruction (n=20) Mean ΔVSS: 13.3 → 9
Palao et al., 2003 Reconstruction (n=12) Mean ΔVSS: 8.1 → 2.5
Dantzer et al., 2003 Acute (n= 11), Acute: Mean VSS of 3.1
Reconstruction (n=11) Reconstructive: Median ΔVSS from 10 → 2