Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD004510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004510.pub3

Fallis 2001.

Methods DETAILS OF STUDY
AIM OF INTERVENTION: To assess the patient's level of recuperation, evaluate the care received and identify inadequacies of the process; furthermore it demonstrates a sense of caring about patients and assists in marketing an ambulatory surgery program.
AIM OF STUDY: To investigate the post‐discharge follow‐up required for patients who have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy on an outpatient basis and to determine if there was a significant difference in mean concern scores and satisfaction level of patients followed up by a home visit versus a telephone call.
STUDY DESIGN: CCT.
METHODS OF RECRUITMENT OF PARTICIPANTS: a convenience sample of patients scheduled for elective or urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION IN STUDY: not requiring postoperative admission; willing to be discharged on the day of operation, have a responsible caregiver and have a telephone.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION IN STUDY: open cholecystectomy.
INFORMED CONSENT OBTAINED? yes.
ETHICAL APPROVAL? yes.
FUNDING: yes.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDY QUALITY
ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT: adequate.
EPOC‐ QUALITY CRITERIA 2002: C.high risk of bias.
METHOD OF GENERATING RANDOMISATION SCHEDULE: predetermined schedule; patients allocated by an operating room slating clerk.
METHOD OF CONCEALMENT OF ALLOCATION: patients allocated by an operating room slating clerk.
BLINDING: 
 ·PARTICIPANTS: no. 
 ·PROVIDER/S: no. 
 ·OUTCOME ASSESSOR/S: no.
INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS: not stated.
BASELINE COMPARABILITY OF INTERVENTION AND CONTROL GROUPS: yes.
STATISTICAL METHODS AND THEIR APPROPRIATENESS: chi‐square/t‐test.
CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT: not stated.
Participants DESCRIPTION: surgery patients.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: Canada.
SETTING: discharged home from an acute care setting.
NUMBER OF PARTTICIPANTS: 
 ELIGIBLE: 152. 
 RANDOMISED TO INTERVENTION: 78. 
 RANDOMISED TO CONTROL: 72. 
 INCLUDED IN ANALYSIS INTERVENTION GROUP: 77. 
 INCLUDED IN ANALYSIS CONTROL GROUP: 72.
AGE: RANGE OR MEAN (SD): 42 (13).
GENDER (% MALE): 20.
ETHNICITY: unclear.
PRINCIPAL HEALTH PROBLEM OR DIAGNOSIS: unclear.
OTHER HEALTH PROBLEM/S: unclear.
TREATMENT RECEIVED/RECEIVING: cholecystectomy.
OTHER SOCIAL/DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS: 25% smoker.
Interventions DETAILS OF INTERVENTION: not specified.
DETAILS OF CONTROL: home visit by a nurse.
CO‐INTERVENTION? no.
DETAILS OF CO‐INTERVENTIONS: usual care.
DELIVERY OF INTERVENTION 
 Frequency: 1. 
 First time at day 0 after discharge. 
 Period:
PROVIDERS: nurse.
INTERVENTION QUALITY: unclear.
FIDELITY/INTEGRITY: unclear.
Outcomes NUMBER OF OUTCOMES: 4
OUTCOME / TOOL / TOOL VALIDATED / METHOD OF ASSESSMENT / TIME OF ASSESSMENT 
 A.Psycho‐social health of patients (uncertainty, anxiety, informational needs, mood, coping, quality of life, social activity, ..): Satisfaction / self‐developed / no / telephone interview / 2 days after discharge 
 patient concerns / self‐developed / no / telephone interview / 2 days after discharge.
B.Physical health of patients (eg. functional status, self‐care, self‐efficacy, independence, ..):
C.Other consumer oriented outcomes (eg. treatment adherence, knowledge, adverse events, ..):
D. Health service delivery oriented outcomes (eg. hospital readmission, health services utilization, ..): Readmission / hospital record / unclear / status analysis / 4 weeks after discharge. ED‐visits / hospital record / unclear / status analysis / 4 weeks after discharge.
Notes ·CHANGES IN TRIAL PROTOCOL
·CONTACT WITH AUTHOR
·POWER CALCULATION?
·RECORD IF THE STUDY WAS TRANSLATED FROM A LANGUAGE OTHER THAN ENGLISH.
·RECORD IF THE STUDY WAS A DUPLICATE PUBLICATION.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate