Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD004510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004510.pub3

Ouellet 2003.

Methods DETAILS OF STUDY
AIM OF INTERVENTION: to help ease surgical orthopaedic patients' transition from hospital to home and to identify problems associated with this transition.
AIM OF STUDY: this was a pilot study designed to explore the effectiveness of a post‐discharge telephone call for surgical orthopaedic patients; the focus of the study was to identify and resolve problems associated with the study protocol and the data collection tools.
STUDY DESIGN: CCT.
METHODS OF RECRUITMENT OF PARTICIPANTS: the sample was drawn from a pool of adult patients admitted to the orthopaedic unit for either elective or emergency orthopaedic surgery during a 3 month period. Prospective participants were identified through the use of posters placed in patients' rooms. Patients who expressed an interest in the study were approached prior to their discharge by a research assistant who explained the purpose of the study.
INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION IN STUDY: English speaking/ 17 years and older/ discharged to a private residence with phone.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION IN STUDY: not specified.
INFORMED CONSENT OBTAINED? yes.
ETHICAL APPROVAL? unclear.
FUNDING: unclear.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDY QUALITY
ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT: unclear.
EPOC‐ QUALITY CRITERIA 2002: C. high risk of bias.
METHOD OF GENERATING RANDOMISATION SCHEDULE: unclear.
METHOD OF CONCEALMENT OF ALLOCATION: not specified.
BLINDING: 
 ·PARTICIPANTS: no. 
 ·PROVIDER/S: no. 
 ·OUTCOME ASSESSOR/S: yes.
INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS: not stated.
BASELINE COMPARABILITY OF INTERVENTION AND CONTROL GROUPS: yes.
STATISTICAL METHODS AND THEIR APPROPRIATENESS: not stated.
CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT: not stated.
Participants DESCRIPTION: surgery patients.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: Canada.
SETTING: discharged home from an acute care setting.
NUMBER OF PARTTICIPANTS: 
 ELIGIBLE: 60. 
 RANDOMISED TO INTERVENTION: 27. 
 RANDOMISED TO CONTROL: 26. 
 INCLUDED IN ANALYSIS INTERVENTION GROUP: 27. 
 INCLUDED IN ANALYSIS CONTROL GROUP: 26.
AGE: RANGE OR MEAN (SD): 56.8 (17.6).
GENDER (% MALE): 55.
ETHNICITY: not stated.
PRINCIPAL HEALTH PROBLEM OR DIAGNOSIS: orthopedic problem.
OTHER HEALTH PROBLEM/S: unclear.
TREATMENT RECEIVED/RECEIVING: orthopedic surgery (68% elective, 32% emergency).
OTHER SOCIAL/DEMOGRAPHIC DETAILS: 69% high school or more.
Interventions DETAILS OF INTERVENTION: The intervention consisted of a follow‐up call made by the unit manager (=nurse), or her designate, 24 to 72 hours post discharge. Information obtained was recorded on a form which consisted of a checklist of specific concerns/problems often encountered by post‐op patients and a list of relevant nursing interventions in addition to information about the call.
DETAILS OF CONTROL: usual care.
CO‐INTERVENTION? no.
DETAILS OF CO‐INTERVENTIONS:
DELIVERY OF INTERVENTION: 
 Frequency: 1. 
 First time at day 1‐3 after discharge. 
 Period:
PROVIDERS: nurse.
INTERVENTION QUALITY: length of intervention between 1‐25 minutes.
FIDELITY/INTEGRITY: unclear.
Outcomes NUMBER OF OUTCOMES: 3
OUTCOME / TOOL / TOOL VALIDATED / METHOD OF ASSESSMENT / TIME OF ASSESSMENT 
 A.Psycho‐social health of patients (uncertainty, anxiety, informational needs, mood, coping, quality of life, social activity, ..):
B.Physical health of patients (eg. functional status, self‐care, self‐efficacy, independence, ..):Symptoms / self‐developed / yes / telephone interview / 4 weeks after discharge. Recovery / self‐developed / yes / telephone interview / 4 weeks after discharge.
C.Other consumer oriented outcomes (eg. treatment adherence, knowledge, adverse events, ..):
D. Health service delivery oriented outcomes (eg. hospital readmission, health services utilization, ..): Readmission / self‐developed / yes / telephone interview / 4 weeks after discharge. ED‐visits.
Notes ·CHANGES IN TRIAL PROTOCOL: no comparison results given.
·CONTACT WITH AUTHOR: yes.
·POWER CALCULATION?
·RECORD IF THE STUDY WAS TRANSLATED FROM A LANGUAGE OTHER THAN ENGLISH.
·RECORD IF THE STUDY WAS A DUPLICATE PUBLICATION.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear