Methods | Sample size: no justification. Generation of allocation schedule: by computer. Allocation concealment: yes. Intention‐to‐treat: yes. Interim analyses: no. | |
Participants | Patients with chronic hepatitis D (n = 42) from Italy. Inclusion criteria: age 18 to 60, positive HDV antibody, serum HDV RNA documented on three occasions in the last six months, elevated ALT for six months, histological evidence of chronic hepatitis, positive test for intrahepatic delta antigen, no signs of active HBV infection. Exclusion criteria were: antiviral therapy within six months, pregnancy, lactation, decompensated cirrhosis, clotting abnormalities precluding liver biopsy, hepatocellular carcinoma, WBC < 3000/cmm, platelets < 100,000/cmm. |
|
Interventions | Control: no treatment (n =14). Experimental 1: interferon alfa‐2a 9 million units thrice a week (n =14). Experimental 2:interferon alfa‐2a 3 million units thrice a week (n =14). Duration : 48 weeks. Follow‐up: 6 months post treatment. Long term follow‐up: mean 32 months (24 to 48). |
|
Outcomes | Loss of HDV RNA. Normalisation of ALT. Improvement in liver histology. | |
Notes | One patient lost to follow‐up in the control group. Intention to treat analysis was done throughout. Experimental 1 and 2 groups were taken together and compared with the control group. Control group did not get end of treatment biopsy. However, all groups offered six months post treatment biopsy, and these data were used for analysis of histological improvement. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "Using computer‐generated sealed envelopes, we randomly assigned patients..." It does not mention whether the envelops were opaque or not |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unblinded trial design. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote "All patients with the exception of one in the control group were evaluated at the end of six months of follow‐up." |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcome measures adequately reported. |