Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;2016(3):CD008378. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008378.pub3

Comparison 2. Lively Legs programme versus outpatient wound clinic.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Number of people healed 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Proportion with recurrence 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Proportion fully adherent to compression 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 6 months 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 12 months 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.3 18 months 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]