Comparison 2. Lively Legs programme versus outpatient wound clinic.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Number of people healed | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
2 Proportion with recurrence | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
3 Proportion fully adherent to compression | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
3.1 6 months | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] | |
3.2 12 months | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] | |
3.3 18 months | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] |