Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD009051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009051.pub2

Summary of findings for the main comparison.

Hepatitis A vaccines for preventing clinical hepatitis A in those not previously exposed

Hepatitis A vaccines for preventing hepatitis A in those not previously exposed
Patient or population: patients with preventing hepatitis A. Settings: pre‐exposure. Intervention: hepatitis A vaccines.
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) Number of participants (trials) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comment
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Hepatitis A vaccines
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (low risk of bias trials) Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months 4 per 1000 4 per 1000 (0 to 1) RR 0.09 (0.03 to 0.30) 41430 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (all included trials) Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 1 to 60 months 1 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) RR 0.09 (0.05 to 0.17) 732380 (9 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (inactivated HAV vaccines) low risk of bias trials Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months 4 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 1) RR 0.09 (0.03 to 0.30) 41430 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (inactivated HAV vaccines) all included trials Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months 5 per 1000 1 per 1000 (0 to 1) RR 0.12 (0.05 to 0.31) 41690 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (live attenuated HAV vaccines) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 See comments See comments No included inactivated HAV vaccine study was at low risk of bias.
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (live attenuated HAV vaccines) all included trials Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 1 to 60 months 1 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) RR 0.07 (0.03 to 0.17) 690690 (5 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (Dose of live attenuated HAV vaccine, titre >= TCID50 ) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 See comment See comment No included inactivated HAV vaccine study was at low risk of bias.
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (Dose of live attenuated HAV vaccine, titre >= TCID50 ) all included trials Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 24 to 60 months 9 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 1) RR 0.03 (0.02 to 0.06) 62270 (2 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (Dose of live attenuated HAV vaccine, titre < TCID50 ) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 See comment See comment No included inactivated HAV vaccine study was at low risk of bias.
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (Dose of live attenuated HAV vaccine, titre < TCID50 ) all included trials Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 1 to 36 months 0 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) RR 0.11 (0.05 to 0.26) 628420 (3 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (low endemicity) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 12 months 71 per 1000 14 per 1000 (6 to 31) RR 0.19 (0.08 to 0.42) 1037 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (low endemicity) all included trials Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 12 months 71 per 1000 14 per 1000 (6 to 30) RR 0.19 (0.08 to 0.42) 1037 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (high endemicity) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 15 to 17 months 3 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) RR 0.05 (0.01 to 0.17) 40393 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (high endemicity) all included trials Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 1 to 60 months 1 per 1000 1 per 1000 (0 to 0) RR 0.08 (0.04 to 0.15) 731343 (8 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (single dose regimen) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 15 months 124 per 1000 4 per 1000 (0 to 58) RR 0.03 (0 to 0.47) 274 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (single dose regimen) all included studies
Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 1 to 60 months
1 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) RR 0.07 (0.03 to 0.15) 690707 (6 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (multiple doses) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months 4 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 1) RR 0.11 (0.03 to 0.40) 41156 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (multiple doses) all included trials
Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months
4 per 1000 1 per 1000 (0 to 1) RR 0.14 (0.05 to 0.37) 41416 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ moderate
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (follow‐up duration 1 to 12 months) low risk of bias Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 12 months 71 per 1000 14 per 1000 (6 to 30) RR 0.19 (0.08 to 0.42) 1037 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (follow‐up duration 1 to 12 months) all included trials
Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 1 to 12 months
47 per 1000 9 per 1000 (5 to 17) RR 0.20 (0.1 to 0.37) 2377 (3 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (follow‐up duration 13 to 24 months) low risk of bias
Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 15 to 17 months
3 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 0) RR 0.05 (0.01 to 0.17) 40393 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Clinicially apparent hepatitis A (follow‐up duration 13 to 24 months) all included trials
Dienstag 1999 Follow‐up: 15 to 24 months
4 per 1000 0 per 1000 (0 to 1) RR 0.06 (0.02 to 0.17) 164776 (4 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (follow‐up duration 25 to 48 months) low risk of bias See comments See comments Insufficients evidence
Clinicially apparent hepatitis A (follow‐up duration 25 to 48 months) all included trials
Dienstag 1999
Follow‐up: 36 months
0 per 1000 (0 to 0) RR 0.05 (0.02 to 0.13) 564642 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (follow‐up duration 49 to 60 months) low risk of bias See comments See comments Insufficient evidence
Clinically apparent hepatitis A (follow‐up duration 49 to 60 months) all included trials
Dienstag 1999
Follow‐up: 60 months
67 per 1000 4 per 1000 (1 to 27) RR 0.06 (0.01 to 0.41) 585 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low
All‐cause mortality low risk of bias
Mortality
Follow‐up: 17 months
0 per 1000 (0 to 2) RR 1.40 (0.62 to 3.16) 585 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
All‐cause mortality all included trials
Mortality
Follow‐up: 17 months
0 per 1000 (0 to 2) RR 1.40 (0.62 to 3.16) 585 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Hepatitis A‐related mortality See comment See comment No trial directly addressed this as an outcome.
Lack of sero‐protection, (anti HAV IgG < 10mIU/L) (low risk of bias) Maiwald 1997 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months See comment See comment No study included this outcome.
Lack of sero‐protection, (anti HAV IgG < 10mIU/L) (all included trials) Maiwald 1997 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months See comment See comment No study included this outcome.
Lack of sero‐protection, (anti HAV IgG < 20mIU/L) (low risk of bias ) Maiwald 1997 Follow‐up: 17 months 972 per 1000 10 per 1000 (0 to 29) RR 0.01 (0.00 to 0.03) 486 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Lack of sero‐protection, (anti HAV IgG < 20mIU/L) (all included trials) Maiwald 1997 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months 973 per 1000 10 per 1000 (0 to 29) RR 0.01 (0 to 0.03) 739 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low
Non‐serious local adverse events (low risk of bias) inactivated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 Follow‐up: 12 to 15 months 85 per 1000 101 per 1000 (57 to 179) RR 1.19 (0.67 to 2.11) 1299 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Non‐serious local adverse events (all included trials) ICH‐GCP 1997 Follow‐up: 12 to 15 months 98 per 1000 118 per 1000 (84 to 166) RR 1.21 (0.86 to 1.70) 1559 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low
Non‐serious systemic adverse events (low risk of bias) inactivated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 Follow‐up: 12 to 15 months 42 per 1000 45 per 1000 (28 to 74) RR 1.09 (0.67 to 1.78) 1299 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ high
Non‐serious systemic adverse events (all included studies) inactivated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997
Follow‐up: 12 to 15 months
65 per 1000 64 per 1000 (45 to 92) RR 0.98 (0.68 to 1.41) 1599 (4 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low
Non‐serious local adverse events (low risk of bias) live attenuated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 See comment See comment Insufficient evidence
Non‐serious local adverse events (all included studies) live attenuated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 See comment See comment Insufficient evidence
Non‐serious systemic adverse events (low risk of bias) live attenuated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 Follow‐up: 12 to 17 months See comment See comment Insufficient evidence
Non‐serious systemic adverse events (all included studies) live attenuated HAV vaccine ICH‐GCP 1997 See comment See comment Insufficient evidence
*The basis for the assumed risk (eg, the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect. Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate. Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.