Methods |
Randomised trial comparing supplements to no supplements in hospitalized patients with alcoholic liver disease. Geographical location Santiago, Chile. Paper published 1989. |
Participants |
Inclusion criteria: Excessive alcohol ingestion for at least 2 years, 2 or more signs of liver failure (jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, hepatomegaly, collateral circulation, edema) who had not been in hospital > 3 days. Exclusion criteria: Contraindication for oral or enteral feeding, current upper gastrointestinal bleeding, grade IV hepatic encephalopathy, extrahepatic major organ (cardiac, pulmonary, renal) failure. 40 patients (no details regarding sex, mean age 49). |
Interventions |
Intervention group received nutritional supplement (casein, maltodextrin, MCT, sunflower oil) to increase intake to 50 kcal/kg and 1.5 gms protein/kg per day; Controls received standard diet containing 35 kcal/kg and 0.8 gm protein/kg per day. All patients received bed rest, sodium restriction prn, vitamins. Duration therapy 3 to 4 weeks. |
Outcomes |
Mortality, appearance/resolution hepatic encephalopathy, duration hospitalization, bilirubin. |
Category of study |
Supplement/Medical. |
Sample size calculation |
Not reported if done. |
Full paper or abstract only |
Full paper. |
Notes |
Request for further information sent via e‐mail on September 18, 2011 (dbunout@inta.cl). No response has been received as of March 20, 2012. |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Only states "randomly assigned". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
No details. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
High risk |
Not blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Low risk |
Four dropouts accounted for. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Mortality and morbidity outcomes reported. |
Other bias |
Unclear risk |
Funder of trial not reported. |
Intent to treat analysis |
High risk |
Could not be done. |
Baseline imbalance? |
Low risk |
No imbalance identified. |
Early stopping? |
Unclear risk |
No sample size calculation and unknown why stopped. |