Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD008344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008344.pub2
Methods Randomised trial comparing supplements to no supplements in hospitalized patients with alcoholic liver disease. Geographical location Santiago, Chile. Paper published 1989.
Participants Inclusion criteria: Excessive alcohol ingestion for at least 2 years, 2 or more signs of liver failure (jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, hepatomegaly, collateral circulation, edema) who had not been in hospital > 3 days. Exclusion criteria: Contraindication for oral or enteral feeding, current upper gastrointestinal bleeding, grade IV hepatic encephalopathy, extrahepatic major organ (cardiac, pulmonary, renal) failure. 40 patients (no details regarding sex, mean age 49).
Interventions Intervention group received nutritional supplement (casein, maltodextrin, MCT, sunflower oil) to increase intake to 50 kcal/kg and 1.5 gms protein/kg per day; Controls received standard diet containing 35 kcal/kg and 0.8 gm protein/kg per day. All patients received bed rest, sodium restriction prn, vitamins. Duration therapy 3 to 4 weeks.
Outcomes Mortality, appearance/resolution hepatic encephalopathy, duration hospitalization, bilirubin.
Category of study Supplement/Medical.
Sample size calculation Not reported if done.
Full paper or abstract only Full paper.
Notes Request for further information sent via e‐mail on September 18, 2011 (dbunout@inta.cl). No response has been received as of March 20, 2012.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Only states "randomly assigned".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes High risk Not blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Four dropouts accounted for.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Mortality and morbidity outcomes reported.
Other bias Unclear risk Funder of trial not reported.
Intent to treat analysis High risk Could not be done.
Baseline imbalance? Low risk No imbalance identified.
Early stopping? Unclear risk No sample size calculation and unknown why stopped.