Methods |
Randomised trial comparing enteral nutrition to no enteral nutrition in patients hospitalized with variceal bleeding associated with cirrhosis. Geographical location: Poitiers, France. Paper published 1997. |
Participants |
Inclusion criteria: Patients admitted for active variceal bleeding which had been stabilized associated with cirrhosis. Exclusion criteria: Hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatorenal syndrome, severe hepatic encephalopathy, age > 80 years. 22 hospitalized patients (17 male/5 female, mean age 56). |
Interventions |
Intervention group received enteral nutrition through nasogastric tube (commercial formulation [Dripac Sondalis, Sopharga, France] with 1665 kcal and 71 gm protein/day until second sclerotherapy) + standard feeding; Control group given oral diet (nothing by mouth X 3 days, low‐Na milk on day 4, mixed warm low‐Na diet on day 5, 1800 kcal low Na diet from day 6 on). Mean duration of therapy 8.5 days. |
Outcomes |
Mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, infections, duration of hospitalization, bilirubin, body weight, triceps skinfold thickness, midarm muscle circumference, nitrogen balance. |
Category of study |
Enteral nutrition/Medical. |
Sample size calculation |
Not reported if done. |
Full paper or abstract only |
Full paper. |
Notes |
Request for information sent via e‐mail on September 16, 2011 (victor.deledinghen@chu‐bordeaux.fr). No response has been received as of March 20, 2012. |
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Only states "randomly assigned patients". |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
No details. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
High risk |
Not blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Low risk |
No dropouts. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Mortality and morbidity outcomes reported. |
Other bias |
Unclear risk |
Fund source not reported. |
Intent to treat analysis |
Low risk |
No dropouts. |
Baseline imbalance? |
Low risk |
No imbalance identified. |
Early stopping? |
Unclear risk |
No sample size calculation and unknown why stopped. |