Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD008344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008344.pub2
Methods Randomised trial comparing enteral nutrition to no enteral nutrition in patients hospitalized with variceal bleeding associated with cirrhosis. Geographical location: Poitiers, France. Paper published 1997.
Participants Inclusion criteria: Patients admitted for active variceal bleeding which had been stabilized associated with cirrhosis. Exclusion criteria: Hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatorenal syndrome, severe hepatic encephalopathy, age > 80 years. 22 hospitalized patients (17 male/5 female, mean age 56).
Interventions Intervention group received enteral nutrition through nasogastric tube (commercial formulation [Dripac Sondalis, Sopharga, France] with 1665 kcal and 71 gm protein/day until second sclerotherapy) + standard feeding; Control group given oral diet (nothing by mouth X 3 days, low‐Na milk on day 4, mixed warm low‐Na diet on day 5, 1800 kcal low Na diet from day 6 on). Mean duration of therapy 8.5 days.
Outcomes Mortality, gastrointestinal bleeding, infections, duration of hospitalization, bilirubin, body weight, triceps skinfold thickness, midarm muscle circumference, nitrogen balance.
Category of study Enteral nutrition/Medical.
Sample size calculation Not reported if done.
Full paper or abstract only Full paper.
Notes Request for information sent via e‐mail on September 16, 2011 (victor.deledinghen@chu‐bordeaux.fr). No response has been received as of March 20, 2012.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Only states "randomly assigned patients".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes High risk Not blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No dropouts.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Mortality and morbidity outcomes reported.
Other bias Unclear risk Fund source not reported.
Intent to treat analysis Low risk No dropouts.
Baseline imbalance? Low risk No imbalance identified.
Early stopping? Unclear risk No sample size calculation and unknown why stopped.