Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;34(6):1324–1332. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.051

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of patients with brain metastasis of uterine cervical cancer

No. Age at BM, yr Interval to BM, mon OS after BM, mon Patient status KPS score at BM Histology Initial FIGO stage CTx regimen before BM Controlled primary state Extracranial meta No. of BM Local Tx after BM CTx after BM RPA GPA
1 51 70 18 Dead 50 SQ IIB 2 Yes Yes 5 No Yes 3 0.5
2 45 93 27 Dead 60 SQ IB2 1 No Yes 1 RT Yes 3 2
3 75 63 4 Dead 50 SQ IIB 0 Yes Yes 1 No Yes 3 1
4 34 14 1 Dead 50 SC IB2 3 No Yes > 10 RT No 3 1
5 53 38 2 Dead 60 SQ IIB 5 Yes Yes 4 RT No 3 0.5
6 58 45 11 Dead 80 SQ IIB 1 Yes Yes 1 OP + RT Yes 2 2
7 69 166 10 Dead 20 SQ IIB 1 Yes Yes 3 RT No 3 0.5
8 45 17 9 Dead 80 SC IIA2 2 Yes No 1 OP + RT Yes 1 3.5
9 53 9 23 Dead 80 SC IVB 2 Yes Yes 1 OP + RT Yes 2 2
10 55 16 0 Dead 50 AD IB1 3 No Yes > 10 No No 3 0.5
11 31 19 1 Dead 20 AS IIB 1 Yes Yes 1 No No 3 2
12 50 10 73 Alive 70 SC IIB 1 Yes No 1 OP + RT Yes 1 3
13 71 15 15 Dead 80 AD IB1 1 Yes Yes 1 OP + RT Yes 2 1.5
14 58 25 6 FU loss 60 CS IVB 2 Yes Yes 1 OP + RT Yes 3 1.5
15 55 27 6 Dead 70 AD IIB 3 Yes Yes 3 RT Yes 2 1.5
16 40 19 8 Alive 80 SQ IVB 3 No Yes > 10 RT Yes 2 1.5
17 53 23 4 Alive 80 SQ IIB 2 Yes No 2 RT Yes 1 2.5
18 58 6 2 Dead 80 SQ IVB 1 Yes Yes 1 RT No 2 2
19 74 9 5 FU loss 70 SQ IIB 1 Yes Yes 1 RT Yes 2 1.5

BM, brain metastasis; OS, overall survival; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; CTx, chemotherapy; Tx, therapy; PRA, recursive partitioning analysis; GPA, graded prognostic assessment; SQ, squamous cell carcinoma; RT, radiotherapy; SC, small cell carcinoma; OP, surgery; AD, adenocarcinoma; AS, adenosquamous cell carcinoma; FU, follow-up; CS, carcinosarcoma.