Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;43(4):676–683. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2019.05.006

Table 4.

Between-group comparison of fatigue changes using the TCM symptom scale after specified treatments

Variable Change during Week 1 Change during Week 2 Change during Week 3 Change during Week 4
Total TCM symptom score A −0.01±0.03 −0.07±0.05 −0.15±0.10 −0.22±0.10
B −0.06±0.042) −0.15±0.062) −0.27±0.121) −0.37±0.141)
C −0.1±0.074) −0.2±0.143) −0.33±0.174) −0.44±0.214)
Major symptoms A −0.02±0.03 −0.08±0.06 −0.17±0.11 −0.24±0.12
B −0.06±0.031) −0.17±0.041) −0.29±0.11 −0.40±0.14
C −0.11±0.083) −0.21±0.16 −0.35±0.22 −0.47±0.28
Secondary symptoms A 0.00±0.02 −0.06±0.04 −0.12±0.08 −0.19±0.07
B −0.05±0.05 −0.13±0.09 −0.24±0.14 −0.33±0.15
C −0.08±0.06 −0.18±0.12 −0.31±0.09# −0.39±0.084)

KRG, Korean Red Ginseng; TCM, traditional Chinese medicine.

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

A: participants were given placebo 3.6 g/d;.B: participants were given KRG 1.8 g/d; C: participants were given KRG 3.6 g/d.

1)

For the difference between the changes during KRG 1.8 g versus placebo, using an effect model; P < 0.05 compared with the control.

2)

For the difference between the changes during KRG 1.8 g versus placebo, using an effect model; P < 0.01 compared with the control.

3)

For the difference between the changes during KRG 3.6 g versus placebo, using an effect model; P < 0.05 compared with the control.

4)

For the difference between the changes during KRG 3.6 g versus placebo, using an effect model; P < 0.01 compared with the control.