Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 28;25(40):6053–6062. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053

Table 1.

Quantitative ultrasound: Optimal cutoffs obtained using proton density fat fraction with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard

Technique S0 vs S1–S3 S0–S1 vs S2–S3 S0–S2 vs S3
BSC[20], 1/cm-sr (NAFLD) 0.0038 --------- ---------
Sensitivity: 93% --------- ---------
Specificity: 97% --------- ---------
CAP[30], dB/m (NAFLD) 288 --------- ---------
Sensitivity: 75%
Specificity: 77%
ATI[40], dB/cm/MHz (NAFLD) 0.63 0.72 ---------
Sensitivity: 80% Sensitivity: 100% ---------
Specificity: 89% Specificity: 78% ---------
UGAP[43], dB/cm/MHz (NAFLD) 0.63 0.68 0.74
Sensitivity: 80% Sensitivity: 83% Sensitivity: 87%
Specificity: 91% Specificity: 74% Specificity: 79%
SSE[46], mm/μs (not specified) 1.537 1.511 ---------
Sensitivity: 80% Sensitivity: 100% ---------
Specificity: 86% Specificity: 96% ---------

In parenthesis: Etiology of liver disease. BSC: Backscatter coefficient; sr: Square radian; CAP: Controlled attenuation parameter; dB: Decibel; ATI: Attenuation imaging; MHz: Megahertz; UGAP: Ultrasound guided attenuation parameter; SSE: Sound speed estimation; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.