Table 3.

Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for variables predicting psychological consequences following a WPV incident among healthcare workers.

Variable	Model 1			Model 2			Model 3			Model 4
	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β	B	SE B	β
Sex	−0.52	0.32	−0.09	−0.46	0.31	−0.08	−0.50	0.31	−0.09	0.55	0.56	0.10
Age	0.27	0.13	0.12*	0.21	0.13	0.10	0.21	0.13	0.10	0.17	0.13	0.08
Victim.	0.10	0.02	0.42***	0.09	0.02	0.39***	0.09	0.02	0.37***	0.08	0.02	0.35***
Witness	−0.01	0.02	−0.05	−0.01	0.02	−0.05	−0.01	0.02	−0.03	−0.00	0.02	−0.01
Inj. without	0.15	0.40	0.02	0.11	0.40	0.02	0.00	0.40	0.00	−0.03	0.39	−0.00
Inj. with	2.01	0.45	0.26***	1.85	0.45	0.24***	1.64	0.45	0.21***	1.77	0.44	0.22***
Coll. sup.				−0.37	0.20	−0.12	−0.31	0.20	−0.10	−0.29	0.20	−0.09
Emp. sup.				−0.24	0.19	−0.08	−0.12	0.20	−0.04	−0.12	0.19	−0.04
Normalization							−0.43	0.29	−0.08	0.18	0.35	0.04
Taboo of complaining							0.78	0.32	0.15*	0.89	0.37	0.17*
Sex × normalization										−1.81	0.61	−0.27**
Sex × taboo										−0.21	0.62	−0.03
Adjusted R2		0.21			0.23			0.24			0.27
F for change in R2		11.59***			4.41*			3.86*			4.61*

N = 250 for all models. ‘Victim.’ refers to ‘past victimization’; ‘inj. without’ refers to ‘Injury without hospitalization’; ‘inj. with’ refers to ‘injury with hospitalization’; ‘coll. sup.’ refers to ‘colleagues support’; ‘emp. sup’ refers to ‘employer support’; ‘sex × taboo’ refers to the interaction between sex and taboo of complaining.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.