Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;28(5):582–594. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054419

Table 3.

Relative nicotine delivery in mainstream HnB or e-cigarette aerosol in comparison to nicotine delivered to mainstream cigarette smoke

Auer et al 21 2017* Farsalinos et al 22 2018† Bekki et al 23 2017 Schaller et al 24 2016 Schaller et al 25 2016 Jaccard et al 26 2017 Forster et al 36 2018 Poynton et al 30 2017‡
Affiliation University of Bern, Switzerland University of Patras, Greece National Institute of Public Health, Japan PMI PMI PMI BAT BAT
Reference cigarette used Lucky Strike Blue Lights Marlboro Regular 3R4F 3R4F 3R4F 3R4F 3R4F 3R4F
Product Nicotine levels, % (mg)
 Reference cigarette (set as 100%) 0.361 1.99 1.70 1.89 1.88 1.86 2.02 1.84
 IQOS 83%
(0.30)
71%
(1.41)
65%
(1.10)
70%
(1.32)
73%
(1.38)
61%
(1.14)
57%
(1.16)
 Glo 23%
(0.462)
 iFuse 19%
(2.56/0.358)
 Cigalike e-cigarette 43%
(0.86)
 Second-generation pen-style e-cigarette 87%
(1.73)
27%
(3.57/0.500)
 Third-generation tank-style e-cigarette 92%
(1.84)

*Provided nicotine values under ISO machine puffing regimen.

† Nicotine levels for HnB and e-cigarettes provided under 4 s puffing regimen.

Nicotine levels were provided for 100 puff blocks under 3 s puffing regimen; nicotine level for 14 puffs was calculated by multiplying the nicotine level for 100 puffs by 0.14.

–, Not measured; BAT, British American Tobacco; PMI, Philip Morris International.