Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Transplant. 2019 Sep 13;23(7):e13568. doi: 10.1111/petr.13568

Table 3.

Duration of prophylaxis and provision of appropriate prophylaxis by organ group and risk status pre-and post-intervention

Transplant Type and Risk Median duration of prophylaxis
(days) (Q1,Q3)
Appropriate prophylaxis
(appropriate agent for risk status)
n (%)
Appropriate prophylaxis
(appropriate duration and dose)
n (%)
Pre Post p-value* Pre Post p-value** Pre Post p-value**
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
Kidney
High 363(355,368) 365(354,379) 0.45 24(100%) 0(0%) 19(100%) 0(0%) -- 1(4%) 23(96%) 0(0%) 19(100%) 0.99
Intermediate 365(364,378) 365(360,371) 0.39 18(100%) 0(0%) 14(100%) 0(0%) -- 0(0%) 18(100%) 0(0%) 14(100%) --
Low 371(364,522) 367(365,369) 0.54 0(0%) 26(100%) 1(9%) 10(91%) 0.30 -- -- -- -- --
Liver
High 90(84,136) 183(173,195) <0.01 9(100%) 0(0%) 9(100%) 0(0%) -- 1(11%) 8(89%) 8(89%) 1(11%) <0.01
Intermediate 89(84,125) 178(66,183) 0.62 8(89%) 1(11%) 7(100%) 0(0%) 0.99 7(78%) 2(22%) 2(29%) 5(71%) 0.13
Low -- -- -- 0(0%) 11(100%) 4(57%) 3(43%) 0.01 -- -- -- --
Lung
High 396(299,504) 242 0.40 4(100%) 0(0%) 2(100%) 0(0%) -- 3(75%) 1(25%)Ψ 2(100%) 0(0%) 0.99
Intermediate 550(294,842) 395(201,508) 1.00 4(100%) 0(0%) 8(89%) 1(11%)Ψ 0.99 2(50%) 2(50%)Ψ 3(33%) 6(67%)Ψ 0.99
Low -- -- -- 1(25%) 3(75%)Ψ 1(100%) 0(0%) 0.40 -- -- -- -- --
Heart
High 90(86–118) 125(86,251) 1.00 11(100%) 0(0%) 9(100%) 0(0%) -- 2(18%) 9(82%)κ 3(33%) 6(67%)κ 0.62
Intermediate 88(81–100) 147(95,189) 0.24 5(100%) 0(0%) 6(100%) 0(0%) -- 5(100%) 0(0%) 3(50%) 3(50%)κ 0.18
Low -- -- -- 4(50%) 4(50%)κ 11(92%) 1(8%)κ 0.11 -- -- -- -- --
Multivisceral
High 1376 292 0.33 1(100%) 0(0%) 2(100%) 0(0%) -- 0(0%) 1(100%)β 1(50%) 1(50%)β 0.99
Intermediate 509(227,1281) 687 1.00 5(100%) 0(0%) 1(100%) 0(0%) -- 1(20%) 4(80%)β 0(0%) 1(100%)β 0.99
Low -- -- -- 0(0%) 2(100%)β 0(0%) 0(0%) -- -- -- -- -- --
Non-kidney grafts -- -- -- 52(71%) 21(29%) 60(92%) 5(8%) <0.01 21(43%) 27(56%) 22(49%) 23(51%) 0.62
High 97(90,277) 182(136,234) 0.03 25(100%) 0(0%) 22(100%) 0(0%) -- 6(24%) 19(76%) 14(64%) 8(36%) <0.01
Intermediate 115(87,405) 182(95,380) 0.37 22(96%) 1(4%) 22(96%) 1(4%) 0.99 15(65%) 8(35%) 8(35%) 15(65%) 0.04
Low -- -- -- 5(20%) 20(80%) 16(80%) 4(20%) <0.01 -- -- -- -- --
*

p-value from independent samples median test;

**

p-value from fisher’s exact/chi-square test testing for difference in categorical variables pre- and post-intervention.

Kidney: All low risk recipients received 12 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis when none was recommended in the standardized protocols; High and intermediate risk recipients received longer than recommended duration of prophylaxis

Liver: 7 out of 8 high risk patients who received inappropriate duration of prophylaxis in the pre-intervention period received shorter than recommended duration while 1 high-risk patient in the post-intervention period received longer than recommended duration; 1 intermediate risk patient in the pre-intervention period received inappropriate agent (acyclovir) while 1 received longer than necessary prophylaxis. 4 out of 5 intermediate risk patients who received inappropriate duration of prophylaxis in the post-intervention period received longer than recommended duration while 1 received shorter than recommended duration. 11 low risk recipients in the pre-intervention period received acyclovir prophylaxis while 3 out of 7 low risk recipients in the post-intervention period received acyclovir prophylaxis when none was recommended.

Ψ

Lung: 1 high risk patient and 2 intermediate risk patients who received inappropriate duration of prophylaxis in the pre-intervention period received longer than recommended duration. 1 intermediate risk patient in the post-intervention period received acyclovir instead of valganciclovir prophylaxis. 4 out of 6 intermediate risk patients who received inappropriate duration of prophylaxis in the post-intervention period received longer than necessary prophylaxis. 3 out of 4 low risk patients in the pre-intervention period received valganciclovir prophylaxis when none was recommended.

κ

Heart: 7 out of 9 high risk patients who received inappropriate duration of prophylaxis in the pre-intervention period and 4 out of 6 high risk patients who received inappropriate duration of prophylaxis in the post-intervention period received shorter than recommended duration. All 3 intermediate risk patients who received inappropriate duration of prophylaxis in the post-intervention period received longer than recommended duration. 4 out of 8 low risk patients in the pre-intervention period and 1 out of 12 low risk patients in the post-intervention period received prophylaxis when none was recommended.

β

Multivisceral: Both low risk patients in the pre-intervention period received valganciclovir prophylaxis when none was recommended. All high and intermediate risk patients who had received inappropriate duration of prophylaxis in both periods received longer than recommended duration.