Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 13;110(11):3464–3475. doi: 10.1111/cas.14184

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards regression for overall survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age (>65 vs ≤65) 1.191 (0.851‐1.668) .309
Sex (male vs female) 0.705 (0.386‐1.287) .255
Tumor stage (T1‐2 vs T3‐4) 0.557 (0.249‐1.248) .155
LN status (N0 vs N+) 0.255 (0.123‐0.527) .001 0.238 (0.083‐0.682) .008
Tumor length (>5 vs ≤5) 1.576 (0.528‐4.702) .415
KPS score (≥80 vs <80) 0.960 (0.917‐1.006) .085
Radiation dose (≤50.4 Gy vs >50.4 Gy) 1.056 (0.381‐2.925) .917
Chemotherapy (PF vs PP) 0.767 (0.410‐1.435) .407
Comorbidities (≥1 vs 0) 1.634 (0.849‐3.145) .141
Weight loss, % (>5% vs ≤5%) 0.656 (0.336‐1.283) .218
VCP expression (high vs low) 0.457 (0.265‐0.789) .005 2.042 (1.151‐3.621) .015

Abbreviations: –, not included; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; KPS, Karnofsky performance status; LN, lymph node; PF, cisplatin + 5‐fluorouracil; PP, cisplatin + paclitaxel; VCP, valosin‐containing protein.