Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 28;110(11):3533–3542. doi: 10.1111/cas.14192

Table 3.

Prognostic value of Mul1 expression on disease‐free survival by Cox proportional hazards model

Variable Disease‐free survival
HR (95% CI) P‐value
Univariate analysis
Age, y (≥60 vs <60) 1.820 (1.330‐2.491) .000**
Gender (Male vs Female) 1.058 (0.778‐1.440) .719
Tumor invasion (T1‐T2 vs T3‐T4) 3.164 (2.339‐4.281) .000**
Lymph node stage (N0 vs N1) 3.386 (1.797‐6.377) .000*
Pathological grade (G1‐G2 vs G3‐G4) 2.612 (1.860‐3.669) .000*
Clinical stage (S1‐S2 vs S3‐S4) 3.853 (2.810‐5.283) .000**
Distant metastasis (M0 vs M1) 4.348 (3.187‐5.930) .000**
Mul1 expression (low vs high) 0.552 (0.402‐0.757) .000**
Multivariate analysis
Mul1 expression (low vs high) 0.663 (0.479‐0.918) .013*
Tumor invasion (T1‐T2 vs T3‐T4) 2.308 (1.672‐3.186) .000**
Age, y (≥60 vs <60) 1.605 (1.168‐2.208) .004**
Pathological grade (G1‐G2 vs G3‐G4) 1.765 (1.227‐2.540) .002**

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; Mul1, mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin ligase 1.

*P < .05; **P < .01.