Skip to main content
. 2019 May 23;13(6):579–599. doi: 10.1007/s11571-019-09540-1

Table 2.

attentional modulation of mean spike counts of excitatory and inhibitory neurons in layer 1, 2 and 3 through AMPA receptors

Mean spike count Unattended (mean ± s.e.m.)
σAMPA=0.08(excitatory)
σAMPA=0.09(inhibitory)
Mean spike count
Attended (mean ± s.e.m.)
σAMPA=0.075(excitatory)
σAMPA=0.075(inhibitory)
Increased percentage (Ratt.-Runatt.)Runatt. (%) Significance test between excitatory and inhibitory neurons
Layer 1
 Excitatory 13.33±0.03 13.43±0.03 0.75ns Absolute increase (ns)
 Inhibitory 42.19±0.01 42.32±0.01 0.31ns Relative increase (ns)
Layer 2
 Excitatory 8.151±0.06 8.57±0.06 4.83** Absolute increase (**)
 Inhibitory 14.50±0.09 16.32±0.07 11.15** Relative increase (**)
Layer 3
 Excitatory 5.05±0.08 5.54±0.08 8.81** Absolute increase (**)
 Inhibitory 6.95±0.11 8.67±0.10 19.76** Relative increase (**)

Remark: Ratt. represents the mean spike count in the attention attended condition and Runatt. represents the activity in the attention unattended condition. The increased percentage indicates attentional modulation of firing rates. Statistical significance between the attention attended and unattended conditions was checked by Mann–Whitney U test (indicated in the column of Increased percentage, ns: p  > 0.05; **: p  < 0.01) for each type of neurons in each layer. Statistical significance of attention-modulated effects were calculated between excitatory and inhibitory neurons from the same layer in Absolute and Relative increases by Mann–Whitney U test (ns p  > 0.05; **p  < 0.01), respectively