Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 14;34(6):852–861. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-09979-8

Table 3.

Penetration-aspiration scores for VFSS and FEES and different bolus volumes and consistencies

Grouped PA-score VFSS
1 2–5 6–8 Total
FEES
 3 m1
  1 39 6 3 48
  2–5 1 12 5 18
  6–8 0 1 8 9
  Total 40 19 16 75
  p-value 0.003
 5 ml
  1 34 4 1 39
  2–5 1 10 3 14
  6–8 0 1 5 6
  Total 35 15 9 59
  p-value 0.052
 10 ml
  1 27 5 1 33
  2–5 0 2 2 4
  6–8 0 0 2 2
  Total 27 7 5 39
  p-value 0.007
 20 ml
  1 20 6 1 27
  2–5 0 2 0 2
  Total 20 8 1 29
  p-value 0.011
 Nectar
  1 51 9 3 63
  2–5 1 5 5 11
   6–8 0 0 3 3
  Total 52 14 11 77
  p-value < 0.001
 Pudding
  1 40 2 1 43
  2–5 0 13 0 13
  6–8 0 1 9 10
  Total 40 16 10 66
  p-value 0.257
 Liquid
  1 29 10 2 41
  2–5 1 8 5 14
  6–8 0 1 3 4
  Total 30 19 10 59
  p-value 0.001

Chart shows the PA scores grouped in normal swallow, penetration and aspiration for both modalities for different bolus volumes and bolus consistencies

PA score penetration aspiration score