Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 24;14(4):465–473. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v14i4.5453

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of slanted and augmented recession in both eso- and exotropic patients


Factors Total Groups
ET XT
Slanted Augmented P-value Slanted Augmented P-value
N (%) 100 26 (26%) 24 (24%) 25 (25%) 25 (25%)
Age of operation (years) Mean ± SD 9.83 ± 9.65 9.6 ± 9.84 7.64 ± 2.33 0.333 11.21 ± 8.31 12.92 ± 13.48 0.449
Sex M 37 (37.0%) 10 (38.5%) 10 (40.0%) > 0.999* 8 (33.3%) 9 (36.0%) 0.834*
F 63 (63.0%) 16 (61.5%) 15 (60.0%) 16 (66.7%) 16 (64.0%)
Prematurity No 97 (97.0%) 26 (100.0%) 23 (92.0%) 0.054** 23 (95.8%) 25 (100.0%) 0.237**
Yes 3 (3.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (8.0%) 1 (4.2%) 0 (0.0%)
Parent consanguinity No 84 (84.0%) 19 (73.1%) 19 (76.0%) 0.822* 23 (95.8%) 23 (92.0%) 0.678**
Yes 16 (16.0%) 7 (26.9%) 6 (24.0%) 1 (4.2%) 2 (8.0%)
Family H/O strabismus No 88 (88.0%) 22 (84.6%) 21 (84.0%) > 0.999** 21 (87.5%) 24 (96.0%) 0.155**
Yes 12 (12.0%) 4 (15.4%) 4 (16.0%) 3 (12.5%) 1 (4.0%)
ET, esotropia; XT, exotropia; N, number; FU, follow-up; H/O, history of; M, male; F, female; P, probability
Based on t-test
*Based on Chi-Square test
**Based on Fisher exact test