Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 May 3;30(9):1829–1851. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2019.1611606

Table 4:

Effectiveness of the Intervention for Case Study 3

Measure Pre-Intervention Score Post-Intervention Score Difference Normative Score M (SD) Range of Scores Test-Retest RC Score RCI Reliable Change?
PRMQ1 54 51 −3 38.8 (9.15) 0 – 80 0.89 0.16 −0.31 No
IADL-C2 76 73 −3 37.97 (15.48) 27 – 216 0.91 −0.45 −0.89 No
CSES3 67 93 26 96.94 (20.48) 0 – 130 0.87 2.49 4.88 Yes
SWLS4 16 23 7 24.6 (6.9) 5 – 35 0.85 −1.85 3.63 No
QoL-AD5 25 25 0 38.35 (4.88) 13 –52 0.87 0 0 No

Note: PRMQ = Prospective Retrospective Memory Questionnaire; IADL-C = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living- Compensation; CSES = Coping Self-efficacy Scale; SWLS = Life Satisfaction Scale; QoL-AD = Quality of Life – Alzheimer’s disease.

1

Crawford et al., 2003; N = 551, general adult population (ages 17 – 94; M age = 63.62; SD = 15.59)

2

Local norms used; N = 146, healthy older adult population (ages 51 – 89; M age = 68.29; SD = 8.51)

3

Local norms used; N = 45, healthy older adult population (ages 52 – 86; M age = 67.58; SD = 7.95)

4

Pavot et al., 1991; N = 39, older adult population (M age = 74.00, SD = 8.97; SD = 15.59)

5

Local norms used, N = 53, older care-partner population (ages 48 – 85; M age = 65.01; SD = 9.11)