Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2019 Jul 13;120:394–418. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.06.015

Table 3 –

Eyetracking results showing Thematic Prediction (TP) and Thematic Integration (TI) scores for each participant at baseline (BL) and post-testing (Post) phases of the study. The TP score is the proportion of target fixations within the region encompassing the sentence subject (N1) and the verb (V) region. The TI score is derived by subtracting the proportion of target fixations in the V region from the proportion of target fixations in the sentence end region. Both scores were computed on correctly-answered passive sentences only. NT = not tested.

Score Participant P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P14 Group Average
TP BL .52 .63 .57 .45 .73 .50 NT .49 .62 .59 .42 .73 .57 NT .57
FU .51 .52 .47 .61 .41 .37 NT .41 .47 .52 .46 .55 .33 NT .47
Change .00 −.11 −.10 .16 −.32 −.13 −.08 −.15 −.07 .04 −.18 −.23 −.10
TI BL .22 .11 −.16 −.03 .04 .32 NT −.04 −.01 −.02 .10 −.17 .53 NT .07
FU .30 .24 −.02 .17 .08 .24 NT .31 .26 .24 .20 .15 .60 NT .23
Change .09 .13 .14 .20 .05 −.08 .35 .27 .27 .10 .32 .07 .16
Score Participant C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Group Average
TP BL .45 .69 .55 NT .60 .57
FU .39 .48 .42 NT .47 .44
Change −.06 −.21 −.12 −.14 −.13
TI BL .07 .05 .22 NT −.02 .08
FU −.04 .16 .10 NT −.02 .05
Change −.11 .11 −.12 .00 −.03