Table 1:

Statistical methods by figure

Set of data	Type of analysis	Results of analysis
Figure 2
B: time to reach platform in Morris water maze: group x testing session interaction	Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA	F(9,100) = 0.902	p = 0.527
C: comparison by genotype of the percentage of time spent freezing to context	Kruskal–Wallis test	H(3) = 4.64	p = 0.20
D: comparison by genotype of the percentage of time spent freezing to cue	Kruskal–Wallis test	H(3) = 6.46	p = 0.09
E: comparison by genotype of time with novel/time with familiar on test day	Kruskal–Wallis test	H(3) = 22.97	p < 0.0005
F: time spent at partition: group × testing session interaction	Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA	F(6,118) = 4.908	p < 0.0005
Figure 3
C: comparison by genotype of Fano factor of firing rate	Kruskal–Wallis test	H(3) = 8.92	p = 0.03
D: comparison by genotype of firing rate	Kruskal–Wallis test	H(3) = 6.62	p = 0.085
Figure 5
C: within-unit comparison of variance of ISI prestimulation and poststimulation	Permutation test of F statistic
D: comparison by genotype of response rates	χ2 test of homogeneity	CR(2) = 6.02	p = 0.049
Figure 6
A: comparison by treatment type of time with novel/time with familiar on test day	Wilcoxon rank sum test	Rank sum = 120	p = 0.03
B: comparison by treatment type of firing rate variability	Wilcoxon rank sum test	Rank sum = 293	p = 0.087
D: within unit comparison of variance of ISI prestimulation and poststimulation	Permutation test of F statistic
E: comparison by treatment type of response rates	χ2 test of homogeneity	CR(2) = 4.15	p = 0.126