Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 30;10(10):769. doi: 10.3390/genes10100769

Table 11.

Potential hotspots for rearrangement in the pig genome based on translocation frequency.

Hotspot Observed Breakpoints Physical Cytogenetic Band Length (Mb) Expected Breakpoints X2 Value Fold Change Between Observed and Expected Translocation Frequency
10q13 4 4.449 0.7 15.5571 5.7143 0.8991
11q11 3 3.413 0.54 11.2067 5.5556 0.879
12q15* 5 5.798 0.91 18.3825 5.4945 0.8624
14q151 4 5.114 0.8 12.8 5 0.7822
9p24* 7 9.302 1.46 21.0216 4.7945 0.7525
4q11 3 4.013 0.63 8.9157 4.7619 0.7476
6q11 3 4.078 0.64 8.7025 4.6875 0.7357
7q13* 5 6.851 1.07 14.4345 4.6729 0.7298
15q26 4 5.628 0.88 11.0618 4.5455 0.7107
15q13* 10 14.326 2.25 26.6944 4.4444 0.698
1q17*1 7 10.738 1.68 16.8467 4.1667 0.6519
2q13 3 4.73 0.74 6.9022 4.0541 0.6342
12p15 2 3.347 0.52 4.2123 3.8462 0.5976
14q11* 6 10.177 1.6 12.1 3.75 0.5896
14q13 3 5.14 0.81 5.9211 3.7037 0.5837
X2 = 194.759, d.f =14, p < 1 × 10−5, σest = 3.784, * = Band has both ≥5 breakpoints, and >0.58 translocation frequency, 1 = Band has a common fragile site