Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 8;9(10):771. doi: 10.3390/ani9100771

Table 1.

Fatty acid classes and indices of milk from sheep grazing only fresh herbage compared to different levels of oilseed supplementation [44].

Treatment SEM p-Value
PAS NFS SLNA SALA
MUFA % FAME 24.67 ab 22.27 b 28.62 a 28.81 a 0.89 0.04
PUFA % FAME 6.68 c 6.89 bc 9.84 a 9.58 ab 0.34 0.01
SFA/UFA ratio 2.14 ab 2.44 a 1.66 b 1.66 ab 0.09 0.03
AI (index) ratio 2.06 ab 2.63 a 1.87 b 1.88 ab 0.10 0.02
n-3/n-6 ratio 2.08 a 0.71 bc 0.60 c 0.90 b 0.12 0.01
I-Harris % FAME 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.01 0.06
UTFA % FAME 0.30 b 0.35 b 0.60 a 0.54 a 0.03 0.01
UTFA/CLA ratio 0.13 b 0.19 a 0.23 a 0.19 a 0.01 0.01

PAS = only pasture (24 h); NFS = pasture (3 h) + non fat enriched supplement; SLNA = pasture (3 h) + fat enriched supplement (based on 10.60% of raw sunflower seed and 4.80% of linseed on DM basis, respectively); SALA = pasture (3 h) + fat enriched supplement (based on 10.50% of linseed and 2.90% of raw sunflower seed on DM basis respectively); I-Harris = (DHA + EPA) SEM = standard error of means; UTFA = (C18:1 t9+C18:2 t9, t12); UTFA/CLA = (UTFA/CLAc9t11)*100; FAME = fatty acid methyl ester; different letters between columns represent the effect of treatment (a,b Differ at least at p < 0.05).