Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(1):81–88. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix718

Table 5.

Predictors of a Positive Mumps Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Test in Students With Probable or Confirmed Mumps, University of Iowa Student Mumps Cases, 13 July 2015–13 May 2016a

Binary Regression Multivariable Regression

Predictor Variable OR (95% CI) P Value AOR (95% CI) P Value
Parotitis 12.0 (2.3–64.0) .004 11.2 (2.0–85.6) .008
Fever 1.6 (.86–3.1) .14
Any complication 1.3 (.35–4.5) .73
Illness length (each additional day) 1.03 (.94–1.2) .55
Severe illness 1.09 (.47–2.5) .85
Time to laboratory collection (each additional day) 0.77 (.65–.90) .002 0.77 (.65–.89) .002
Time between last MMR vaccine and illness (each additional year) 1.05 (.99–1.1) .09
Last MMR vaccination <180 d prior to illness onset 0.38 (.16–.93) .03 0.34 (.13–.92) .03

Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MMR, measles-mumps-rubella; OR, odds ratio.

a

Two hundred twenty-one University of Iowa students had a mumps polymerase chain reaction test result.