Table 5.
Rate of catch-up growth in the different BW groups (%, n/N)
| VLBW | LBW | NBW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | |||
| 0–6 Mon | 29(29/100) | 26.5(117/441) | 24.7(41/166) |
| 0–12 Mon | 35.1(33/94) ab | 22.2(100/451) a | 16.9(29/172) b |
| Length | |||
| 0–6 Mon | 50(50/100) ab | 28(123/441) ac | 16.9(28/166) b |
| 0–12 Mon ac | 48.9(46/94) ab | 30.1(136/451) | 15.7(27/172) bc |
| HC | |||
| 0–6 Mon | 19(19/100) b | 13.4(59/441) c | 6(10/166) bc |
| 0–12 Mon | 29.8(28/94) ab | 14.1(64/451) ac | 7.5(13/172) bc |
A: significant difference between the VLBW and LBW groups, p < 0.01
B: significant difference between the VLBW and NBW groups, p < 0.01
C: significant difference between the LBW and NBW groups, p < 0.01
Mon: months; HC: head circumference; VLBW:very low birth weight, birth weight < 1500 g; LBW: low birth weight, 1500 g ≤ birth weight < 2500 g; NBW:normal birth weight,2500 ≤ birth weight<4000 g. Catch-up growth: a change in the Z-score > 0.67 between two time points. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze