Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 4;19:403. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1752-8

Table 5.

Rate of catch-up growth in the different BW groups (%, n/N)

VLBW LBW NBW
Weight
 0–6 Mon 29(29/100) 26.5(117/441) 24.7(41/166)
0–12 Mon 35.1(33/94) ab 22.2(100/451) a 16.9(29/172) b
Length
 0–6 Mon 50(50/100) ab 28(123/441) ac 16.9(28/166) b
 0–12 Mon ac 48.9(46/94) ab 30.1(136/451) 15.7(27/172) bc
HC
 0–6 Mon 19(19/100) b 13.4(59/441) c 6(10/166) bc
 0–12 Mon 29.8(28/94) ab 14.1(64/451) ac 7.5(13/172) bc

A: significant difference between the VLBW and LBW groups, p < 0.01

B: significant difference between the VLBW and NBW groups, p < 0.01

C: significant difference between the LBW and NBW groups, p < 0.01

Mon: months; HC: head circumference; VLBW:very low birth weight, birth weight < 1500 g; LBW: low birth weight, 1500 g ≤ birth weight < 2500 g; NBW:normal birth weight,2500 ≤ birth weight<4000 g. Catch-up growth: a change in the Z-score > 0.67 between two time points. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze