Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 4;19:265. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1512-2

Table 2.

Effect of patient- and clinical determinants on door-to-needle time, expressed in odds ratio’s (with 95th confidence intervals) for different cut-off points

Door-to-needle time
Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
Cut-off point in minutes Median 90th percentile Mediana 90th percentileb
26 55 26 55
Age (years)
< 50 1.19 (1.01–1.40)c 1.42 (1.11–1.81) c 1.16 (0.98–1.37) 1.38 (1.07–1.76) d
50–75 Reference
> 75 1.12 (0.98–1.27) 1.18 (0.95–1.45) 1.11 (0.97–1.27) 1.21 (0.97–1.49)
Female sex 1.21 (1.11–1.32) c 1.08 (0.94–1.24) 1.17 (1.05–1.31)d
Onset-to-door time (minutes)
< 40 1.10 (0.99–1.23) 1.42 (1.20–1.66) c 1.15 (1.00–1.33) 1.37 (1.11–1.69) d
40–180 Reference
> 180 0.76 (0.65–0.88) c 0.40 (0.28–0.57) c 0.75 (0.61–0.91) d 0.46 (0.28–0.56) d
Admission to comprehensive stroke center 0.94 (0.86–1.03) 1.27 (1.10–1.46) c 1.26 (1.04–1.50) d
Admission during off-hours 1.15 (1.06–1.25) c 1.08 (0.95–1.24) 1.12 (1.01–1.25) d
Year of inclusion
2015 1.24 (1.14–1.34) c 0.97 (0.85–1.11) 1.33 (1.14–1.35) d
2016 Reference

aAdjusted for age, female sex, onset-to-door time, admission during off-hours and year of inclusion. bAdjusted for age, onset-to-door time and admission to comprehensive stroke center. cP-value below 0.1. dP-value below 0.05