Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 3;97(11):4557–4566. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz292

Table 7.

Effects of dietary garcinol on colostrum and milk composition of sows during lactation

Item CON 1 LOW 1 HIGH 1 SEM P-value
Number of sows, n 20 20 20
Colostrum, day 1 of lactation
 DM 22.6 23.7 24.5 0.92 0.105
 Ash, % (DM basis) 14.6 15.7 16.6 0.88 0.226
 CP, % (DM basis) 51.2 48.6 47.2 2.2 0.445
 Ether extract, % (DM basis) 24.6 19.4 16.5 1.9 0.778
 IgG, mg/mL 48.04a 51.65b 53.44b 0.21 0.045
 IgA, mg/mL 8.82a 9.21b 9.37b 0.88 0.022
Milk, day 17 of lactation
 DM 18.9 17.5 16.5 0.35 0.441
 Ash, % (DM basis) 9.62 8.87 7.52 0.41 0.126
 CP, % (DM basis) 27.8a 29.2b 31.5b 0.28 0.041
 Ether extract, % (DM basis) 45.6 42.6 38.7 1.4 0.114
 IgG, mg/mL 51.88a 54.92b 55.41b 0.25 0.043
 IgA, mg/mL 9.44a 9.68b 9.85b 0.94 0.033

1Dietary treatment: CON = control diet; LOW = control diet with 200 mg/kg garcinol; HIGH = control diet with 600 mg/kg garcinol. SEM = standard error of means; DM = dry matter; CP = crude protein; IgA = immunoglobulin A; IgG = immunoglobulin G. a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same row differ (P < 0.05).