Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug;22(12):2157–2169. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001289

Table 3.

Multiple linear regression relationships between nutrition literacy scores and dietary pattern adherence among adults (n 386) with at least one of four diet-related diseases, metropolitan Kansas City, USA, January 2015–July 2016

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3§
Dependent variable Estimate 95 % CI β R 2 P Estimate 95 % CI β R 2 P Estimate 95 % CI β R 2 P
PCovR prudent pattern 0·06 0·05, 0·07 0·48 0·23 <0·001 0·04 0·03, 0·06 0·34 0·30 <0·001 0·05 0·04, 0·06 0·40 0·26 <0·001
PCA Western pattern −0·02 −0·03, −0·01 −0·13 0·02 0·003 −0·02 −0·02, 0·0 −0·11 0·10 0·10 −0·02 −0·03, −0·01 −0·15 0·10 <0·006
PCA Mediterranean pattern 0·02 0·00, 0·03 0·12 0·02 0·02 0·01 −0·10, 0·03 0·08 0·01 0·20 0·02 0·00, 0·03 0·12 0·02 0·04

PCovR, principal covariates regression; PCA, principal components analysis; gNLit, global nutrition literacy.

Continuous covariates: age, BMI, household income and education level.

Categorical covariates: sex, race and diabetes status.

Model 1: Simple linear regression of diet pattern adherence predicted by gNLit scores.

Model 2: Multiple linear regression of diet pattern adherence predicted by gNLit scores and all covariates of interest (age, sex, BMI, race, household income, education level and diabetes status).

§

Model 3: Multiple linear regression of diet pattern adherence predicted by gNLit scores and all covariates of interest, excluding education level.