Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul;17(4):363–366. doi: 10.1370/afm.2399

Table 1.

Likelihood of Scheduling Primary Care Appointments With Advanced Practitioners

Coefficient (Percentage Points) P Value
Federally Qualified Health Center 8.52 <.001
Accountable care organization 0.01 .990
Herfindahl-Hirschman index 3.55 .442
Black, % −0.21 <.001
Hispanic, % −0.16 .003
Other, % −0.10 .322
Median income −0.21 .002
Unemployment rate 0.10 .811
Urban, % −0.03 .443
GA 4.73 .060
IA 4.49 .127
IL 2.25 .431
MA 8.71 .007
MT 1.80 .580
NJ 3.02 .332
OR 12.73 .001
PA −0.34 .989
TX 8.18 .014
2014 3.41 .002
2016 5.10 <.001

AP = advanced practitioner; FQHC = Federally Qualified Health Center; GA = Georgia; IA = Iowa; IL = Illinois; MA = Massachusetts; MT = Montana; NJ = New Jersey; OR = Oregon; PA = Pennsylvania; TX = Texas; US = United States.

Note: Linear regression analysis with county-clustered standard errors. The outcome variable is whether an appointment was scheduled with an AP, so coefficients represent percentage points rather than odds ratios. For interpretation, patients were 8.5 percentage points more likely to schedule an AP appointment at an FQHC. Characteristics are from the SK&A Office-Based Physician Database, Area Health Resource File, and US Census. Among states, Arkansas was omitted.