Table 4. Reported concerns and challenges that were experienced during compliance with Institutional Review Board’s procedures and recommended actions .
Concerns/challenges | Recommended actions |
Time-consuming and tedious IRB review process | (1) Advise researchers at the study design stage, (2) Improve communication efforts with PIs, (3) Focus more on the principles of ethics and less on scientific merits of a study, (4) Increase IRB membership, (5) Refer evaluation of studies’ scientific merit to college research committees |
Unavailability of sufficient number of qualified experts to review specialized topics | Solicit the support of experts from the National Committee of Bioethics (NCBE) |
Undergraduate students precluded by IRB from serving as principal investigators | Allow undergraduate students to serve as PIs for their studies if supervised by qualified faculty and received training in basic research and research ethics |
Unfamiliarity by some campus members with the principles of research ethics | Conduct periodic research ethics awareness activities, training, and educational programs |