Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 28;21(6):821–822. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1215-x

Table 1.

Poisson regression models showing the effect of observed technique (OT) of various types (see top row) on practiced technique

All influence no orphans All influence with orphans Maternal no orphans Maternal with orphans Nonmaternal no orphans Nonmaternal with orphans
Coef. Robust SE Coef. Robust SE Coef. Robust SE Coef. Robust SE Coef. Robust SE Coef. Robust SE
Year 2 − 0.515 1.164 − 0.468 1.261 − 0.881 0.886 − 0.728 0.875 − 0.582 1.243 − 0.494 1.351
Year 3 0.476 0.519 1.616 0.725 0.145 0.798 0.291 0.785 0.404 0.556 1.594 0.765
Year 4 1.202 0.593 1.345 0.559 0.301 0.647 0.477 0.606 1.088 0.635 1.204 0.596
Year 5 1.480 0.572 1.752 0.576 0.393 0.659 0.559 0.619 1.385 0.592 1.671 0.599
OT 1.916 0.658 1.672 0.530 0.550 0.725 0.664 0.680 1.794 0.678 1.566 0.550
Year 2 × OT 0.552 1.339 0.423 1.461 0.783 0.934 0.521 0.957 0.626 1.430 0.477 1.571
Year 3 × OT − 0.291 0.617 − 2.172 1.016 − 0.186 0.860 − 0.690 0.900 − 0.178 0.662 − 2.148 1.070
Year 4 × OT − 1.283 0.743 − 1.502 0.697 − 0.377 0.697 − 0.652 0.675 − 1.137 0.800 − 1.302 0.745
Year 5 × OT − 1.346 0.720 − 1.966 0.795 − 0.371 0.719 − 0.762 0.721 − 1.223 0.743 − 1.863 0.825
Female − 1.194 0.439 − 1.643 0.521 − 1.557 0.531 − 1.574 0.545 − 1.183 0.464 − 1.628 0.545
Female × OT 1.308 0.542 2.166 0.718 1.485 0.538 1.757 0.579 1.302 0.592 2.152 0.766
Constant − 1.757 0.546 − 1.655 0.487 − 0.527 0.670 − 0.693 0.632 − 1.662 0.567 − 1.572 0.508