Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;25(6):2143. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0946-4

Table 3.

Manual CAC scoring in CSCT vs (a) manual and (b) automatic CAC scoring in CTAC at rest

Very low Low Intermediate High Very high
Very low 0 12 1 0 0 0
Low 1–10 5 0 1 0 0
Intermediate 11–100 0 2 6 4 0
High 101–400 0 0 3 25 7
Very high >400 0 0 1 6 55
Very low Low Intermediate High Very high
Very low 0 13 0 0 0 0
Low 1–10 5 0 1 0 0
Intermediate 11–100 4 0 3 5 0
High 101–400 2 0 2 22 9
Very high >400 0 0 1 8 53

Cardiovascular risk categories based on the Agatston score (0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, >400) assigned to a patient by the manual scoring in CSCT (rows) and (a) manual and (b) automatic scoring in CTAC scans acquired at rest (columns) taking different ranges of Agatston scores between CSCT and CTAC scan into account