Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 5;2019(11):CD007647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007647.pub2

Summary of findings 5. Community health educational interventions compared to control in LMICs: Sensitivity analysis on primary outcomes.

Community health educational interventions compared to control in developing countries in LMICs: sensitivity analysis
Patient or population: developing countries
 Setting: low‐middle‐income countries, community
 Intervention: community health educational interventions
 Comparison: control
Outcomes Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Neonatal mortality RR 0.88
 (0.79 to 0.98) 497,258
 (22 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Moderatea Not all confidence intervals from these studies overlap; there is also inconsistency in direction across studies
Early neonatal mortality RR 0.71
 (0.62 to 0.82) 26,472
 (11 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Moderatea Most studies overlap and are in the same direction of effect; however there is one major outlier that is also in the opposite direction. The statistical measure for heterogeneity is also high, suggesting inconsistency
Late neonatal mortality RR 0.51
 (0.36 to 0.72) 150,867
 (9 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Moderatea I² (88%) was considerably large; however most confidence intervals overlap, and there is consistent direction of effect
Perinatal mortality RR 0.84
 (0.75 to 0.94) 262,613
 (12 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Moderatea I² (81%) is considerably large; some studies (although with small weighting) support the control, and others support the intervention. Most confidence intervals overlap; however some CIs are large
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: confidence interval; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aInconsistency.