Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 5;2019(11):CD007647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007647.pub2

Mersal 2013.

Methods Experimental randomised controlled study evaluating effects of prenatal counselling on compliance with health promotion and teenage pregnancy outcomes in Egypt
Participants A sample of 86 teenage pregnant women attending the maternal and child health centre, with 43 mothers and their newborns in the control group and the other 43 mothers and newborns in the educational intervention group
Interventions Educational intervention: a prenatal counselling programme was designed by researchers and 3 to 4 sessions were conducted per pregnant woman. A pre‐test on knowledge about health promotion was conducted before counselling and a post‐test was conducted on all participants 3 months after the pre‐test. Pregnany outcome was assessed in 3 to 6 days at home post delivery (n = 47 pregnant teenagers)
Control: participants were recruited from the same health centre; further details of their care were not provided (n = 46)
Outcomes Outcomes: knowledge regarding health promotion pre‐counselling and post‐counselling, pre‐counselling and post‐counselling compliance regarding aspects of health promotion (e.g. antenatal follow‐up, hygiene), pregnancy outcomes (gestational age at labour, type of delivery, full‐term/pre‐term baby, general condition of baby, birth weight, breastfeeding, umbilicus)
Notes Funding: no mention of funding
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Comment: this is a randomised controlled study; however the randomisation process is not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "4 were excluded from the study group and 3 from the controls owing to incomplete data"
Comment: explanation was included; attrition 7.5%
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: this is not a registered trial; outcomes mentioned in the methods section are reported in the results section
Other bias Low risk Study seems to be free from other biases