Agboatwalla 1997 |
This was a non‐randomised controlled trial and therefore was excluded |
Ahluwalia 2000 |
This was a non‐randomised cohort study conducted in Georgia State (USA) and therefore was excluded |
Alexandre 2007 |
This was a non‐randomised cohort study conducted in France and therefore was excluded |
Ayiasi 2015b |
This trial reported only on use of contraceptive during the trial period; no other relevant outcomes on neonatal survival, therefore this trial was excluded |
Bang 1990 |
This was a non‐randomised controlled trial and therefore was excluded |
Bang 1999 |
This was a non‐randomised controlled trial and therefore was excluded |
Baqui 2015 |
This trial was mainly on antibiotic provision for young infants and had no educational component. Also this study did not report on neonatal outcomes only and therefore was excluded |
Bartington 2006 |
This cohort study was conducted in hospitals of the UK and therefore was excluded |
Bhandari 2003 |
This was a cluster‐randomised controlled trial in which infants were enrolled within 72 hours (70%) and 1 week (90%) of life. However, outcomes were assessed at 6 months of age, and the trial was therefore excluded |
Bhandari 2004 |
This was a cluster‐randomised controlled trial in which neonates were enrolled. Main intervention was to promote appropriate complementary feeding practices during infancy. However, outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, 9, and 18 months of age. Because outcomes were not assessed in neonates, this study was excluded |
Bhattacharya 1988 |
Target population was mothers of children younger than 6 years of age, and outcomes were assessed for children younger than 6 years of age. Main intervention was education of mothers and family members about identification of diarrhoea, signs of dehydration, and rehydration with home‐made salt‐sugar solution. This study was excluded because it did not mention any disaggregated data for neonates |
Bhopal 2017 |
This is an abstract that provides insufficient information on outcomes for neonates only; therefore it was excluded |
Bhutta 2009 |
The primary objective of this study was to study the impact of multiple micronutrient supplementation interventions among women of reproductive age; it was therefore excluded |
Bland 2008 |
This was a non‐randomised cohort study in which exclusive breastfeeding was promoted. Outcomes were assessed at 6 months of age; therefore this study was excluded |
Bolam 1998 |
This study was conducted in a 250‐bed hospital and was therefore excluded |
Boulvain 2004 |
This randomised controlled trial was conducted in Switzerland and was therefore excluded |
Carlo 2010 |
This was a before‐and‐after study and was therefore excluded |
Castrucci 2007 |
This cross‐sectional study was conducted in a hospital in Philadelphia and was therefore excluded |
Chapman 2004 |
This study was conducted in a hospital setting of a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Coombs 1998 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Coskun 2009 |
This study was conducted in a hospital setting and was therefore excluded |
Davies‐Abetugbo 1996 |
Education provided involved promotion of breastfeeding alone; therefore this study was excluded |
Dearden 2002 |
Education provided involved promotion of breastfeeding alone; therefore this study was excluded |
Dennis 2001 |
This was a literature review and was therefore excluded |
Di Napoli 2004 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (Italy) and was therefore excluded |
Escobar 2001 |
This randomised controlled trial was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Flax 2009 |
This study focused only on breastfeeding and was therefore excluded |
Foreit 1993 |
This randomised controlled trial was conducted in a hospital setting and was therefore excluded |
Forster 2004 |
This randomised controlled trial was conducted in a hospital setting in a developed country (Australia) and was therefore excluded |
Froozani 1999 |
This was a quasi‐experimental hospital‐based study and was therefore excluded |
Gill 2007 |
This quasi‐experimental study was conducted in the maternity clinics of a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Gill 2011 |
This study had no component on educational intervention and therefore was excluded |
Gross 2009 |
This cross‐sectional study was conducted in a developed country; it was therefore excluded |
Grossman 2009 |
This quasi‐randomised study was conducted in a hospital setting in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Guise 2003 |
This systematic review examined whether primary care‐based interventions improve initiation and duration of breastfeeding. The review included studies from developed countries only and was therefore excluded |
Haider 1996 |
This was a hospital‐based study and was therefore excluded |
Haider 2000 |
This randomised controlled study was conducted to promote breastfeeding alone and was therefore excluded |
Hannula 2008 |
This systematic review was conducted in a developed country to examine professional support interventions for breastfeeding in a hospital setting and was therefore excluded |
Hoare 1999 |
In an educational session, mothers of children 3 years of age were included to participate; this study was therefore excluded |
Hoddinott 2006 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (Scotland) and was therefore excluded |
Hotz 2005 |
All mothers with children 4 to 23 months of age in these communities were invited to participate in nutrition education; therefore this study was excluded |
Ickovics 2007 |
This study was conducted in a hospital‐based setting in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Ingram 2004 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (UK) and was therefore excluded |
Ingram 2009 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (UK) and was therefore excluded |
Jang 2008 |
This quasi‐randomised study was conducted in a hospital setting and was therefore excluded |
Johnson 2017 |
The intervention was based on contraceptive use only and the study included no outcomes on neonatal survival; therefore it was excluded |
Kadam 2005 |
This randomised controlled trial was conducted in a hospital setting and was therefore excluded |
Kafatos 1989 |
This randomised controlled trial was conducted to study the effect of a nutritional intervention programme among pregnant women and was conducted in a developed country (Greece); therefore it was excluded |
Kafatos 1991 |
This study was from a developed country (Greece) and was therefore excluded |
Kimani‐Murage 2015 |
This study did not report on primary or secondary outcomes and therefore was excluded |
Kools 2005 |
This cluster‐randomised trial was conducted to study promotion and support of breastfeeding in a developed country (Netherlands) and was therefore excluded |
Lin 2008 |
This quasi‐experimental study on the effectiveness of an antenatal education programme for breastfeeding outcomes was conducted in a developed country (Taiwan) and was therefore excluded |
MacArthur 2009 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (UK) and was therefore excluded |
Martens 2002 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Merewood 2003 |
This study was conducted in a hospital setting of a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Moran 2006 |
This was a cross‐sectional study and was therefore excluded |
Mottl‐Santiago 2008 |
This retrospective cohort was conducted at a tertiary care centre in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Murihead 2006 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (Scotland) and was therefore excluded |
Nabulsi 2014 |
This is a study protocol with an outcome of knowledge of breastfeeding at 6 months; it was therefore excluded |
Nair 2017 |
This is a randomised controlled trial focused on infant and child outcomes and was therefore excluded |
Nichols 2009 |
This study was conducted in a hospital setting of a developed country (Australia) and was therefore excluded |
Petrova 2009 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Philipp 2001 |
This quasi‐randomised study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Pobocik 2000 |
This study was from a developed country (Guam) and was therefore excluded |
Quinn 2005 |
This was not an experimental study; therefore it was excluded |
Raghupathy 1996 |
In this study, national data were compared and analysed; the study was therefore excluded |
Rahman 2008 |
The objective of this study was not to improve neonatal survival; therefore it was excluded |
Raj 2016 |
The objective of this study was to improve gender equity and family planning; therefore it was excluded |
Rawat 2017 |
This study explored complementary feeding and was therefore excluded |
Rishel 2005 |
This retrospective study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Rosato 2006 |
This was a qualitative review and was therefore excluded |
Rosen 2008 |
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a hospital setting of a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Rossiter 1994 |
This study was conducted in a hospital setting of a developed country (Australia) and was therefore excluded |
Roy 2007 |
This was a randomised controlled trial in which children aged 6 to 9 months were recruited; therefore it was excluded |
Russell 1999 |
This retrospective study was conducted in a hospital setting of a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Ryser 1999 |
This non‐randomised controlled trial was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Ryser 2004 |
This trial was from a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Sachdeva 1994 |
This study focused on nutrition in infants and therefore was excluded |
Sandy 2009 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Schneider 2001 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (Australia) and was therefore excluded |
Seema 1997 |
This prospective study was conducted in hospitalised infants and was therefore excluded |
Serwint 1996 |
This randomised controlled trial was conducted in a hospital setting and was therefore excluded |
Shaw 1999 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Shinwell 2006 |
This prospective cohort study was conducted in a hospital setting and was therefore excluded |
Shrestha 2016 |
Counselling was provided to women in a hospital; therefore this study was excluded |
Sloan 2008 |
Both groups received intervention on essential newborn care, with additional intervention on kangaroo mother care in the intervention arm; therefore this study was excluded |
Stille 2001 |
This study was from a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Susin 2008 |
This controlled clinical trial was conducted in a hospital setting and was therefore excluded |
Svenson 2009 |
This randomised controlled trial was conducted in a hospital setting of a developed country (Australia) and was therefore excluded |
Syed 2006 |
This was not a randomised controlled trial; therefore it was excluded |
Syed 2008 |
This was a review and was therefore excluded |
Tshefu 2015 |
This study had no educational component and was therefore excluded |
Tylleskär 2011 |
This randomised controlled study was conducted to promote breastfeeding alone and was therefore excluded |
Volpe 2000 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Warren 2010 |
This was a before‐and‐after study; therefore it was excluded |
Whitelaw 1988 |
This study was from a developed country (UK) and was therefore excluded |
Wong 2007 |
This study was conducted in a hospital setting of a developed country (Hong Kong) and was therefore excluded |
Yun 2010 |
This study was conducted in a developed country (USA) and was therefore excluded |
Zaidi 2012 |
This study had no educational component and was therefore excluded |
Zaidi 2013 |
This study had no educational component and was therefore excluded |