TABLE 2.
General characteristics of MAGs obtained in this study.
| Bin Id | Phylogenetic assignment | Completeness (%) | Redundancy (%) | Contigs | Genome size (Mbp)∗ | Genome coverage | Share in the whole metagenome (%) |
| 2 | Planctomycetes; Ca. Jettenia | 100.0 | 3.5 | 223∗∗ | 3.86∗∗ | 53 | 30.53 |
| 15 | Planctomycetes; Ca. Brocadia | 90.1 | 9.3 | 867 | 3.55 | 8.0 | 4.15 |
| 17 | Planctomycetes; Ca. Kuenenia | 25.6 | 0.1 | 1298 | 2.03 | 7.0 | 2.08 |
| 16 | Planctomycetes; Phycisphaerales | 67.2 | 6.5 | 1404 | 3.51 | 6.0 | 3.10 |
| 20 | Planctomycetes; Phycisphaerales | 80.5 | 1.8 | 603 | 3.27 | 6.4 | 3.09 |
| 1 | Ignavibacteriae; Ignavibacterium | 86.0 | 0 | 73 | 3.18 | 27 | 12.46 |
| 21 | Ignavibacteriae; Ignavibacterium | 30.7 | 0 | 649 | 1.05 | 3.5 | 0.54 |
| 11 | Chloroflexi; Anaerolineae; Ca. Promineofilaceae | 95.3 | 4.7 | 436 | 5.82 | 9.7 | 8.22 |
| 3 | Chloroflexi; Anaerolineae | 53.1 | 2.0 | 1222 | 2.80 | 4.2 | 1.72 |
| 10 | Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiaceae | 85.9 | 1.3 | 542 | 3.21 | 13 | 5.97 |
| 4 | Betaproteobacteria; Burkholderiaceae | 25.6 | 3.1 | 1057 | 1.49 | 5.9 | 1.28 |
| 7 | Betaproteobacteria; Rhodocyclaceae | 68.3 | 29.7 | 2152 | 3.74 | 3.6 | 2.00 |
| 9 | Armatimonadetes; Fimbriimonadaceae | 73.4 | 3.3 | 924 | 2.95 | 5.2 | 2.26 |
∗Total length of all contigs; ∗∗upon manual curation of this bin.