Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 26;26(30):30988–30999. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06201-y

Table 1.

Retention time, SIM mode, and recovery calculated for three concentration levels and matrix effect for selected PCBs

PCB congener IUPAC name Retention time (min) SIM ions Recovery (%) (RSD) Matrix effect (%) (RSD)
10 (ng/mL) 5 (ng/mL) 2 (ng/mL)
28 2,4,4′- Trichlorobiphenyl 12.118 150.05/186.00/255.90/257.90 96.46 (8.33) 110.61 (9.54) 110.73 (10.36) 3.50 (1.40)
52 2,2′,5,5′-Tetrachlorobiphenyl 12.728 150.05/220.00/254.85/291.90 102.51 (4.86) 116.09 (7.18) 104.44 (8.82) 7.53 (1.14)
101 2,2′,4,5,5′-Pentachlorobiphenyl 14.331 184.00/253.90/325.80 114.04 (8.66) 105.79 (12.71) 117.76 (3.69) 9.68 (0.73)
118 2,3′,4,4′,5′-Pentachlorobiphenyl 15.488 183.90/253.90/255.90/325.80 107.12 (8.76) 111.82 (8.96) 115.03 (8.11) 11.30 (0.31)
153 2,2′,3,4,4′,5′-Hexachlorobiphenyl 16.387 217.90/289.90/359.80 103.61 (7.19) 105.76 (8.70) 119.98 (3.45) 8.34 (1.24)
138 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-Hexachlorobiphenyl 15.877 217.95/289.90/359.80 103.98 (7.13) 107.86 (8.62) 103.10 (8.45) 6.77 (0.45)
180 2,2′,3,4,4′,5,5′-Heptachlorobiphenyl 17.580 251.95/323.80/393.75 101.53 (4.46) 102.64 (6.11) 102.78 (7.91) 1.53 (2.45)