Table 1.
OTU group trends after WECS treatment of HFD-fed mice.
| OTU that Changed by the Water Extract of Caulis Spatholobi | Increase/Decrease Of The HFD+CSH Group Compared with the HFD Group | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level of family | Clostridiaceae | ↑ | 0.036487607 |
| Lachnospiraceae | ↓ | <0.0001 | |
| Ruminococcaceae | ↑ | 0.033080246 | |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | ↑ | 0.047428491 | |
| Level of genus | Facklamia | ↓ | 0.0142127 |
| Enterococcus | ↓ | 0.0035 | |
| Lactobacillus | ↑ | 0.002309373 | |
| Candidatus Arthromitus | ↑ | 0.028112884 | |
| Ruminococcus | ↑ | 0.036487607 | |
| Bacteroides | ↓ | <0.0001 | |
| Prevotella | ↓ | <0.0001 | |
| Adlercreutzia | ↑ | 0.010054934 | |
| Dehalobacterium | ↓ | 0.011452914 | |
| Lactococcus | ↓ | <0.0001 | |
| Oscillospira | ↑ | 0.005455646 | |
| Leuconostoc | ↓ | <0.0001 | |
| Anaerotruncus | ↑ | 0.0159 | |
| Roseburia | ↓ | 0.029076172 | |
| Parabacteroides | ↑ | 0.0018 |
↑ Up arrow represents up-regulation; ↓ Down arrow represents down-regulation.